Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating miRNA panels for specific and early detection in bladder cancer

Open access
Usuba, Wataru, Urabe, Fumihiko, Yamamoto, Yusuke, Matsuzaki, Juntaro, Sasaki, Hideo, Ichikawa, Makiko, Takizawa, Satoko, Aoki, Yoshiaki, Niida, Shumpei, Kato, Ken, Egawa, Shin, Chikaraishi, Tatsuya, Fujimoto, Hiroyuki, Ochiya, Takahiro·2019·Cancer Science

Abstract

Bladder cancer is the 9th leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The major problem in bladder cancer is primarily the high recurrence rate after drug treatment and resection. Although conventional screening methods, such as cystoscopy, urinary cytology and ultrasound sonography, have become widely used in clinical settings, the diagnostic performance of these modalities is unsatisfactory due to low accuracy or high invasiveness. Because circulating micro RNA (miRNA) profiles have recently been reported as an attractive tool for liquid biopsy in cancer screening, here, we performed global miRNA profiling of 392 serum samples of bladder cancer patients with 100 non‐cancer samples and 480 samples of other types of cancer as controls. We randomly classified the bladder cancer and control samples into 2 cohorts, a training set (N = 486) and a validation set (N = 486). By comparing both controls, we identified specific miRNA, such as miR‐6087, for diagnosing bladder cancer in the training and validation sets. Furthermore, we found that a combination of 7 miRNA (7‐miRNA panel: miR‐6087, miR‐6724‐5p, miR‐3960, miR‐1343‐5p, miR‐1185‐1‐3p, miR‐6831‐5p and miR‐4695‐5p) could discriminate bladder cancer from non‐cancer and other types of tumors with the highest accuracy (AUC: .97; sensitivity: 95%; specificity: 87%). The diagnostic accuracy was high, regardless of the stage and grade of bladder cancer. Our data demonstrated that the 7‐miRNA panel could be a biomarker for the specific and early detection of bladder cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cas.13856

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Usuba, W., Urabe, F., Yamamoto, Y., Matsuzaki, J., Sasaki, H., Ichikawa, M., Takizawa, S., Aoki, Y., Niida, S., Kato, K., Egawa, S., Chikaraishi, T., Fujimoto, H., & Ochiya, T.
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-12
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
408-419
ISSN
  • 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7006
OpenAlex
W2898799689
Cited by
257
References
23
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating miRNA panels for specific and early detection in bladder cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cas.13856
The paper
Usuba, W., Urabe, F., Yamamoto, Y., Matsuzaki, J., Sasaki, H., Ichikawa, M., Takizawa, S., Aoki, Y., Niida, S., Kato, K., Egawa, S., Chikaraishi, T., Fujimoto, H., & Ochiya, T. (2019). Circulating miRNA panels for specific and early detection in bladder cancer. Cancer Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13856

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.