Cited by 55Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Perception of object persistence: the origins of object permanence in infancy

Open access
Bremner, J Gavin, Slater, Alan M, Johnson, Scott P·2015·Child Development Perspectives

Abstract

Abstract A dominant account of object knowledge in infancy is based on the assumption that infants possess innate core knowledge of objects through which they reason about events and look longer at those that violate their expectations on the basis of this knowledge. In this article, we propose a perceptual model in which younger infants’ perception of object persistence is subject to greater perceptual constraints compared with infants a few months older, and in which young infants require a combination of cues to perceive object persistence across occlusion. Young infants perceive object persistence under limited conditions and over the early months, perception of persistence becomes more robust. The same analysis may be applied to cases in which stationary objects are occluded, including tasks assessing infants’ numerical competence. We argue that these perceptual developments within the first 6 months likely underpin the later development of cognitive principles, including object permanence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdep.12098

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As young babies, we already know that objects tend to persist over time.

    “As young babies, we already know (Bremner et al., 2015) that objects tend to persist over time.”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Bremner et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baillargeon, R. (1992). The object concept revisited: new directions in the investigations of infants' physical knowledge. In C.E. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception in infancy. Carnegie-Mellon Symposia on Cognition, Vol. 23, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [AU: Please provide page numbers for the chapter.]
  2. Michotte A., Thines, G., & Crabbe, G. (1964/1991). Les complements amodaux des structures perceptives [AU: Please translate French into English]. Louvain, Belgium: Publications Universitaires. Excerpted in G. Thines, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991.
  3. Bremner, J.G., Slater, A.M., Hayes, R.A., Mason, U., Murphy, C., Spring, J., & Johnson, S.P. (2014). Eye-tracking infants in addition and subtraction tasks. Unpublished manuscript under revision for Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.[AU: Has this paper been accepted for publication?]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bremner, J. G., Slater, A. M., & Johnson, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Bremner, J Gavin
Venue
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2015-02-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
7-13
ISSN
  • 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8606
OpenAlex
W2082685143
Cited by
55
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.K. Economic and Social Research Council (R000239979, RES-000-23-1341, RES-062-23-1757)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
object persistence, object permanence, infant perception, occlusion, perceptual development, core knowledge, numerical competence, visual attention, perceptual constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review