The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Comprehension Boost in Early Word Learning: Older Infants Are Better Learners
Open accessAbstract
Recent research has revealed that infants begin understanding words at around 6 months. After that, infants’ comprehension vocabulary increases gradually in a linear way over 8–18 months, according to data from parental checklists. In contrast, infants’ word comprehension improves robustly, qualitatively, and in a nonlinear way just after their first birthday, according to data from studies on spoken word comprehension. In this review, I integrate observational and experimental data to explain these divergent results. I argue that infants’ comprehension boost is not well-explained by changes in their language input for common words, but rather by proposing that they learn to take better advantage of relatively stable input data. Next, I propose potentially complementary theoretical accounts of what makes older infants better learners. Finally, I suggest how the research community can expand our empirical base in this understudied area, and why doing so will inform our knowledge about child development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Second, children become better word learners over the course of development60, similar to a meta-learner improving with training.”
From Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166214 · Cited by 2,727
ROWE, M. L. (2008) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000907008343 · Cited by 904
The relation between pointing and language development: A meta-analysis
Colonnesi, C., Stams, G. J. J. M., Koster, I., & Noom, M. J. (2010) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.10.001 · Cited by 405
Infants are rational constructivist learners
Xu, F., & Kushnir, T. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412469396 · Cited by 119
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Baldwin, 1993, Early referential understanding: Infants’ ability to recognize referential acts for what they are, Developmental Psychology, 29, 832, 10.1037/0012-1649.29.5.832 · DOI
- Bergelson, 2016, Bergelson SEEDLingS Homebank corpus
- Bergelson, 2017, Trajectories of Lexical Comprehension Improvement: Investigating the 14 month Boost
- Bergelson, 2018, Day by day, hour by hour: Naturalistic language input to infants, Developmental science, 22, e12715, 10.1111/desc.12715 · DOI
- Bergelson, 2017, Nature and origins of the lexicon in 6-mo-olds, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 12916, 10.1073/pnas.1712966114 · DOI
- Bergelson, 2012, At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 3253, 10.1073/pnas.1113380109 · DOI
- Bergelson, 2013, The acquisition of abstract words by young infants, Cognition, 127, 391, 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.011 · DOI
- Bergelson, 2013, Young toddlers’ word comprehension is flexible and efficient, PLoS One, 8, e73359, 10.1371/journal.pone.0073359 · DOI
- Bergelson, 2015, Early word comprehension in infants: Replication and extension, Language Learning and Development, 11, 369, 10.1080/15475441.2014.979387 · DOI
- Bergelson, 2018, Young infants’ word comprehension given an unfamiliar talker or altered pronunciations, Child Development, 89, 1567, 10.1111/cdev.12888 · DOI
- Booth, 2008, Shape bias special section: Taking stock as theories of word learning take shape, Developmental Science, 11, 185, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00664.x · DOI
- Bornstein, 2018, Stability of core language skill from infancy to adolescence in typical and atypical development, Science Advances, 4, eaat7422, 10.1126/sciadv.aat7422 · DOI
- Childers, 2002, Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures, Developmental Psychology, 38, 967, 10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.967 · DOI · Paper page
- Darwin, 1877, A biographical sketch of an infant, Annals of Neurosciences, 17, 187
- de Carvalho, 2019, Prosody and function words cue the acquisition of word meanings in 18-month-old infants, Psychological Science, 30, 319, 10.1177/0956797618814131 · DOI
- Fenson, 1994, Variability in early communicative development, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, i+iii-v+1, 10.2307/1166093 · DOI · Paper page
- Fernald, 2013, SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months, Developmental Science, 16, 234, 10.1111/desc.12019 · DOI · Paper page
- Fernald, 2008, Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children, Developmental Psycholinguistics: On-Line Methods in Children’s Language Processing, 2008, 97, 10.1075/lald.44.06fer · DOI
- Forgács, 2019, Fourteen-month-old infants track the language comprehension of communicative partners, Developmental Science, 22, e12751, 10.1111/desc.12751 · DOI
- Frank, 2020, Variability and consistency in early language learning: The Wordbank project
- Frank, 2016, Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data, Journal of Child Language, 44, 1
- Gallistel, 1992, Preverbal and verbal counting and computation, Cognition, 44, 43, 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90050-R · DOI
- Garrison, 2020, Familiarity plays a small role in noun comprehension at 12–18 months, Infancy, 10.1111/infa.12333 · DOI
- Hidaka, 2013, A computational model associating learning process, word attributes, and age of acquisition, PLoS One, 8, e76242, 10.1371/journal.pone.0076242 · DOI
- Karasik, 2010, WEIRD walking: Cross-cultural research on motor development, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 95, 10.1017/S0140525X10000117 · DOI
- Kartushina, 2019, Word knowledge in six- to nine-month-old Norwegian infants? Not without additional frequency cues, Royal Society Open Science, 6, 180711, 10.1098/rsos.180711 · DOI
- Kedar, 2017, Little words, big impact: Determiners begin to bootstrap reference by 12 months, Language Learning and Development, 13, 317, 10.1080/15475441.2017.1283229 · DOI
- Lany, 2018, Infant statistical-learning ability is related to real-time language processing, Journal of Child Language, 45, 368, 10.1017/S0305000917000253 · DOI
- Mollica, 2017, How data drive early word learning: A cross-linguistic waiting time analysis, Open Mind, 1, 67, 10.1162/OPMI_a_00006 · DOI
- Moore, 2019, Point, walk, talk: Links between three early milestones, from observation and parental report, Developmental Psychology, 55, 1579, 10.1037/dev0000738 · DOI
- Parise, 2012, Electrophysiological evidence for the understanding of maternal speech by 9-month-old infants, Psychological Science, 23, 728, 10.1177/0956797612438734 · DOI
- Prelock, 2018, Best practices in child and adolescent behavioral health care. Clinical guide to assessment and treatment of communication disorders, 23
- Rose, 2009, A cognitive approach to the development of early language, Child Development, 80, 134, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01250.x · DOI
- Shukla, 2011, Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 6038, 10.1073/pnas.1017617108 · DOI
- Singh, 2012, Infant word segmentation and childhood vocabulary development: A longitudinal analysis, Developmental Science, 15, 482, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01141.x · DOI
- Snedeker, 2007, Starting over: International adoption as a natural experiment in language development, Psychological Science, 18, 79, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01852.x · DOI
- Spelke, 2007, Core knowledge, Developmental Science, 10, 89, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x · DOI · Paper page
- Tincoff, 1999, Some beginnings of word comprehension in 6-month-olds, Psychological Science, 10, 172, 10.1111/1467-9280.00127 · DOI
- Tincoff, 2012, Six-month-olds comprehend words that refer to parts of the body, Infancy, 17, 432, 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00084.x · DOI
- Tomasello, 2001, Could we please lose the mapping metaphor, please?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1119, 10.1017/S0140525X01390131 · DOI
- Tomasello, 1994, The instrument is great, but measuring comprehension is still a problem, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 174, 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1994.tb00186.x · DOI
- Vihman, 1994, When is a word a word?, Journal of Child Language, 21, 517, 10.1017/S0305000900009442 · DOI
- Wanner, 1986, Language acquisition: The state of the art
- Weisleder, 2013, Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary, Psychological Science, 24, 2143, 10.1177/0956797613488145 · DOI · Paper page
- Werker, 2015, Critical periods in speech perception: New directions, Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 173, 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-like systematic generalization through a meta-learning neural network
Lake, B. M., & Baroni, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06668-3 · Cited by 230
The promise of awake behaving infant fMRI as a deep measure of cognition
Yates, T. S., Ellis, C. T., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.11.007 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergelson, E.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bergelson, Elika
- ORCID
- Bergelson, Elika
- Venue
- Child Development Perspectives
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-08-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 142-149
- ISSN
- 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-8606
- PMC
- PMC7872330
- OpenAlex
- W3034613146
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DP5-OD019812, DP5‐OD019812)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- word learning, spoken word comprehension, vocabulary development, language acquisition, nonlinear development, language input, child development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review