Cited by 35Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The Homogeneity and Heterogeneity of Moral Functioning in Preschool

Tan, Enda, Mikami, Amori Y, Luzhanska, Anastasiya, Hamlin, J Kiley·2021·Child Development

Abstract

The current study examined relations between distinct aspects of moral functioning, and their cognitive and emotional correlates, in preschool age children. Participants were 171 typically developing 3- to 6-year-olds. Each child completed several tasks, including (a) moral tasks assessing both performance of various moral actions and evaluations of moral scenarios presented both verbally and nonverbally; and (b) non-moral tasks assessing general cognitive skill, executive functioning, theory-of-mind, and emotion recognition. Shyness and empathic concern were assessed from video acquired during participation. Results demonstrated positive associations among distinct moral actions, as well as among distinct moral evaluation tasks, but few associations between tasks assessing moral actions and moral evaluation. Empathic concern and inhibitory control each emerged as important predictors of preschoolers' moral functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.13458

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patterns across primary studies that have investigated childhood EF using canonical performance-based measures are difficult to discern, given mixed findings and large variation in sample sizes and effect sizes.

    “Patterns across primary studies that have investigated childhood EF using canonical performance-based measures are difficult to discern, given mixed findings and large variation in sample sizes and effect sizes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Tan, E., Mikami, A. Y., Luzhanska, A., & Hamlin, J. K.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Tan, Enda
Venue
Child Development
Published
2021-05-01
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
959-975
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W3080280495
Cited by
35
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • UBC Hampton Fund Research Grant (12R23060)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
moral functioning, preschool children, moral behavior, moral evaluation, empathic concern, shyness, inhibitory control, executive function, theory of mind, emotion recognition
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Empathy, Humans, Morals, Shyness, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review