Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Next‐generation sequencing targeted disease panel in rod‐cone retinal dystrophies in Māori and Polynesian reveals novel changes and a common founder mutation

Vincent, Andrea L, Abeysekera, Nandoun, van Bysterveldt, Katherine A, Oliver, Verity F, Ellingford, Jamie M, Barton, Stephanie, Black, Graeme CM·2017·Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology

Abstract

Importance: This study identifies unique genetic variation observed in a cohort of Māori and Polynesian patients with rod‐cone retinal dystrophies using a targeted next‐generation sequencing retinal disease gene panel. Background: With over 250 retinal disease genes identified, genetic diagnosis is still only possible in 60–70% of individuals and even less within unique ethnic groups. Design: Prospective genetic testing in patients with rod‐cone retinal dystrophies identified from the New Zealand Inherited Retinal Disease Database, Participants: Sixteen patients of Māori and Polynesian ancestry. Methods: Next‐generation sequencing of a targeted retinal gene panel. Sanger sequencing for a novel PDE6B mutation in subsequent Māori patients. Main Outcome Measures: Genetic diagnosis, genotype–phenotype correlation. Results: Thirteen unique pathogenic variants were identified in 9 of 16 (56.25%) patients in 10 different genes. A definitive genetic diagnosis was made in 7/16 patients (43.7%). Six changes were novel and not in public databases of human variation. In four patients, a homozygous, novel pathogenic variant (c.2197G > C, p.(Ala 733Pro)) in PDE6B was identified and also present in a further five similarly affected Māori patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Over half of the Māori and Polynesian patients with inherited rod‐cone diseases have no pathogenic variant(s) detected with a targeted retinal next‐generation sequencing strategy, which is supportive of novel genetic mechanisms in this population. A novel PDE6B founder variant is likely to account for 16% of recessive inherited retinal dystrophy in Māori. Careful characterization of the clinical presentation permits identification of further Māori patients with a similar phenotype and simplifies the diagnostic algorithm.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ceo.12983

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1111/cge.12203 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1308243110 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.002 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/humu.10263 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215 · DOI
  6. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-103837 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nmeth.2890 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nprot.2009.86 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1101/gr.176601 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02129.x · DOI
  13. 10.1042/bj2830273 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2424 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0076-6879(82)81075-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.193183 · DOI
  17. Ulshafer RJ, 1980, Sensitivity of photoreceptors to elevated levels of cGMP in the human retina, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 19, 1236
  18. Ali S, 2011, Mutations in the beta‐subunit of rod phosphodiesterase identified in consanguineous Pakistani families with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa, Mol Vis, 17, 1373
  19. 10.1006/geno.1995.0001 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.06.017 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/jhg.2012.19 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040019 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1167/iovs.12-11541 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Vincent, A. L., Abeysekera, N., van Bysterveldt, K. A., Oliver, V. F., Ellingford, J. M., Barton, S., & Black, G. C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Ophthalmology, FMHS, New Zealand National Eye Centre University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
  • Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development University of Manchester Manchester UK
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
901-910
ISSN
  • 1442-6404
  • 1442-9071
Cited by
18
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Fight for Sight UK (24RP132)
  • Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland (Faculty Research Development Fund)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review