Cited by 8Child Welfare and AdoptionFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Relationships of young adults with foster care backgrounds: Tensions and management strategies

Tahkola, Elli‐Maria, Metsäpelto, Riitta‐Leena, Ruohotie‐Lyhty, Maria, Poikkeus, Anna‐Maija·2021·Child & Family Social Work

Abstract

Abstract The present study focuses on experiences of relational tensions and management strategies in family relationships among 18 young adults with foster care backgrounds who participated in interviews. In the analysis drawing from relational dialectics, three main tensions were revealed in the participants' relationships with birth and foster family members or in their romantic relationships: the dialectics of emotional distance‐closeness, integration‐separation and sameness‐otherness. In addition, the tension of the childhood dialectic of responsibility was identified in this study. The tensions were managed utilizing eight strategies. The findings highlight the importance of giving a voice to young adults who have experienced the complex web of relationships in at least two families and of sensitizing both birth and foster parents and other adults working with foster children and youth to these tensions in relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cfs.12816

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To manage their experiences, parentified children developed numerous coping strategies, many of which were suboptimal by conventional standards but adaptive for their situation.

    “To manage their experiences, parentified children developed numerous coping strategies, many of which were suboptimal by conventional standards but adaptive for their situation [25,30,32,35,37].”
  • While some youth protected their parents by not sharing worrisome and stressful matters, some youth chose to emotionally distance themselves from mothers to avoid criticism and retraumatization.

    “While some youth protected their parents by not sharing worrisome and stressful matters, some youth chose to emotionally distance themselves from mothers to avoid criticism and retraumitization [31,34,37]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tahkola, E., Metsäpelto, R., Ruohotie‐Lyhty, M., & Poikkeus, A.
Affiliations
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Tahkola, Elli‐Maria
Venue
Child & Family Social Work
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-08
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
358-369
ISSN
  • 1356-7500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2206
OpenAlex
W3112611086
Cited by
8
References
92
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child & Family Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Alli Paasikiven Säätiö
  • Emil Aaltosen Säätiö
  • Jyväskylän Yliopisto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
foster care, young adults, family relationships, relational tensions, relational dialectics, romantic relationships, birth family, foster families, relationship management strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review