Cited by 43Children's Rights and ParticipationEthics in Clinical ResearchQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Informed Consent with Children and Young People in Social Research: Is There Scope for Innovation?

Parsons, Sarah, Sherwood, Gina, Abbott, Chris·2016·Children & Society

Abstract

Over 20 years of research has enhanced our understanding about the methodological and ethical benefits and challenges of involving children and young people in research. Concurrently, the increasing bureaucratisation of research ethics governance within UK universities has reified expectations about the methods used to gain informed consent for research participation. This paper explores how social researchers in the UK are navigating this tension and whether there is any scope for innovation through the use of technologies in how children and young people provide informed consent to take part in research. We conclude there is a need for the co‐creation of research information with children and young people and greater transparency by sharing creative solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/chso.12117

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parsons, S., Sherwood, G., & Abbott, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Parsons, Sarah
Venue
Children & Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-17
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
132-145
ISSN
  • 0951-0605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0860
OpenAlex
W2040756619
Cited by
42
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children & Society (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Southampton
  • Kings College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
informed consent, children and young people, research ethics, research participation, research ethics governance, digital technologies in research, transparency, social research ethics, British universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review