Cited by 3Sleep and related disordersChild Development and Digital TechnologyCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Associations between screen use, outdoor time/daylight exposure and sleep changes during the first COVID‐19 lockdown in French children from the ELFE and EPIPAGE2 birth cohorts

Open access
Kamga Fogno, Alex Wilfried, Rouquette, Alexandra, Gronfier, Claude, Bernard, Jonathan Y., Plancoulaine, Sabine, SAPRIS study group·2023·CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Abstract

Aims: To investigate associations between outdoor and screen time and changes in sleep patterns in children from two nationwide birth‐cohorts in the SAPRIS project. Methods: During the first French COVID‐19 pandemic lockdown, volunteer parents of children enrolled in the ELFE and EPIPAGE2 birth‐cohorts completed online questions about their child's outdoor time, screen time, and changes in sleep duration and quality compared with the pre‐lockdown situation. In 5700 children (aged 8–9 years, 52% boys) with available data, we assessed associations between outdoor time, screen time, and sleep changes using multinomial logistic regression models adjusted for confounders. Results: Children spent on average 3 h08 outdoors and 4 h34 using screens/day (3 h27 for leisure, 1 h07 for class‐work). Sleep duration increased in 36% of children and decreased in 13.4%; sleep difficulties appeared/increased in 22.5% and decreased/disappeared/remained stable in 18.3%. After adjustment, increased screen time, especially for leisure, was associated with increased and decreased sleep duration (OR(95%CI) = 1.03(1.00–1.06) and OR = 1.06(1.02–1.10), respectively). No association was observed between outdoor time and sleep changes after adjustment. Conclusions: Our study adds evidence for the association between high leisure‐time screen time and shorter sleep time. It supports current screen guidelines for children, especially during leisure time and for those whose sleep duration is short.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cns.14128

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a positive association between both total screen time and leisure screen time with the onset or worsening of sleep difficulties (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.06).

    “Fogno (39) found a positive association between both total screen time and leisure screen time with the onset or worsening of sleep difficulties (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.06).”

    From The association of screen time and the risk of sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2025) · cites this paper as Fogno (39)

    The Results report a positive association between total and leisure screen time and new or worsening sleep difficulties in unadjusted analyses, but say it did not remain after adjustment. Table 2 lists the quoted OR of 1.01 (95% CI 0.95–1.06) for adjusted school screen time, not for total or leisure screen time. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamga Fogno, A. W., Rouquette, A., Gronfier, C., Bernard, J. Y., Plancoulaine, S., & SAPRIS study group
Affiliations
  • Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS) Paris France
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Plancoulaine, Sabine
Venue
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-02-20
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1649-1656
ISSN
  • 1755-5930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-5949
OpenAlex
W4321372680
Cited by
3
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐20‐CE36‐0001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
screen time, outdoor time, daylight exposure, children's sleep, sleep duration, sleep quality, sleep disorders, COVID-19 lockdown, leisure screen time, screen time guidelines, ELFE birth cohort
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Birth Cohort, Child, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review