Cited by 17Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesBody Contouring and Surgery

Patient perspectives on psychological care after bariatric surgery: A qualitative study

Chan, Jade K. Y., King, Marlee, Vartanian, Lenny R.·2020·Clinical Obesity

Abstract

Summary: Psychological interventions may be effective in improving adherence after bariatric surgery; however, there is limited research on patients' willingness to engage with psychological aftercare. This study aimed to qualitatively explore patient perspectives on psychological services in the bariatric setting. Participants reported believing that psychological care is essential for treatment success and indicated that they wanted support with adjusting to changes in lifestyle, self‐identity, and relationships after surgery. Participants suggested that psychological aftercare should be recommended by their medical team and incorporated into standard management after bariatric surgery. These findings can be used to inform the design of services for bariatric surgery patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cob.12399

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients report an awareness of the impact of psychological factors on their ability to follow post-operative instructions, and view psychological care as essential for treatment success.

    “Moreover, patients report an awareness of the impact of psychological factors on their ability to follow post‐operative instructions, and view psychological care as essential for treatment success. 45”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, J. K. Y., King, M., & Vartanian, L. R.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Chan, Jade K. Y.
Venue
Clinical Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e12399-e12399
ISSN
  • 1758-8103 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8111
OpenAlex
W3080938981
Cited by
17
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, patient perspectives, psychological intervention, medication adherence, lifestyle modification, self-identity, relationships, obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aftercare, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Postoperative Period, Psychotherapy, Qualitative Research, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review