Cited by 134

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Connecting today's climates to future climate analogs to facilitate movement of species under climate change

Littlefield, Caitlin E., McRae, Brad H., Michalak, Julia L., Lawler, Joshua J., Carroll, Carlos·2017·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Increasing connectivity is an important strategy for facilitating species range shifts and maintaining biodiversity in the face of climate change. To date, however, few researchers have included future climate projections in efforts to prioritize areas for increasing connectivity. We identified key areas likely to facilitate climate‐induced species’ movement across western North America. Using historical climate data sets and future climate projections, we mapped potential species’ movement routes that link current climate conditions to analogous climate conditions in the future (i.e., future climate analogs) with a novel moving‐window analysis based on electrical circuit theory. In addition to tracing shifting climates, the approach accounted for landscape permeability and empirically derived species’ dispersal capabilities. We compared connectivity maps generated with our climate‐change‐informed approach with maps of connectivity based solely on the degree of human modification of the landscape. Including future climate projections in connectivity models substantially shifted and constrained priority areas for movement to a smaller proportion of the landscape than when climate projections were not considered. Potential movement, measured as current flow, decreased in all ecoregions when climate projections were included, particularly when dispersal was limited, which made climate analogs inaccessible. Many areas emerged as important for connectivity only when climate change was modeled in 2 time steps rather than in a single time step. Our results illustrate that movement routes needed to track changing climatic conditions may differ from those that connect present‐day landscapes. Incorporating future climate projections into connectivity modeling is an important step toward facilitating successful species movement and population persistence in a changing climate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cobi.12938

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Littlefield et al. (2017) mapped connections between climatic conditions today and where those conditions will be in the future (i.e., climate analogs).

    “For example, Lawler et al. (2013) used species distribution models to map the routes that organisms might follow to track shifting climates, and Littlefield et al. (2017) mapped connections between climatic conditions today and where those conditions will be in the future (i.e., climate analogs).”

    From Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2019) · cites this paper as Littlefield et al. (2017)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Anderson MG, 2014, Resilient sites for terrestrial conservation in the southeast region
  2. Anderson MG, 2010, Conserving the stage: climate change and the geophysical underpinnings of species diversity, PLOS ONE, 5
  3. Ayebare S, 2013, Report to the McArthur Foundation
  4. Birdlife International, 2014, Bird species distribution maps of the world
  5. 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2049:DDOMIP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  6. 10.1890/11-0213.1 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature12976 · DOI
  8. 10.3354/cr022099 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.292.5517.673 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02263.x · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ncomms12349 · DOI
  12. 10.1175/2011JCLI3955.1 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01681.x · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.289.5487.2068 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.008 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10531-012-0269-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/gcb.12736 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01788.x · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.006 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  21. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2013, Climate change 2013: the physical science basis
  22. IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature), 2014, Red list of threatened species
  23. 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0049 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.aaa7031 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01585.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kujala H, 2013, Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections, PLOS ONE, 8
  27. 10.1111/ele.12132 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1890/150080 · DOI
  29. Mazaris AD, 2013, Evaluating the connectivity of a protected area's network under the prism of global change, PLOS ONE, 8
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1602817113 · DOI
  31. McRae BH, 2016, Conserving nature's stage: mapping omnidirectional connectivity for resilient terrestrial landscapes in the pacific northwest
  32. McRae BH, 2013, Circuitscape 4 user guide
  33. 10.1111/cobi.12014 · DOI
  34. 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0097 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00245.x · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10584-013-0752-1 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nature01286 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Patterson BD, 2007, Digital distribution maps of the mammals of the Western Hemisphere
  39. 10.2307/1310052 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07147.x · DOI
  41. 10.1111/cobi.12556 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.1116791109 · DOI
  43. 10.3375/043.035.0120 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.018 · DOI
  45. Seto KC, 2011, A meta‐analysis of global urban land expansion, PLOS ONE, 6
  46. Settele J, 2014, Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, 271
  47. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x · DOI
  48. 10.5751/ES-00184-040116 · DOI
  49. 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Theobald D, 2016, Data basin
  52. 10.1007/s10980-013-9941-6 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/nyas.12184 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.007 · DOI
  56. 10.1134/S000143381004002X · DOI
  57. Wang T, 2016, Locally downscaled and spatially customizable climate data for historical and future periods for North America, PLOS ONE, 11
  58. 10.1175/2010JCLI3679.1 · DOI
  59. 10.1890/070037 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Littlefield, C. E., McRae, B. H., Michalak, J. L., Lawler, J. J., & Carroll, C.
Affiliations
  • School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington Box 352100 Seattle WA 98195 U.S.A.
  • The Nature Conservancy North America Region 117 E Mountain Ave, Suite 201 Fort Collins CO 80524 U.S.A.
  • Klamath Center for Conservation Research Box 104 Orleans CA 95556 U.S.A.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-10
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1397-1408
ISSN
  • 0888-8892
  • 1523-1739
Cited by
134
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Wilburforce Foundation
  • National Park Service (J8W0711014)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX17AF58G)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review