CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Projected climate‐driven faunal movement routes

Lawler, J. J., Ruesch, A. S., Olden, J. D., McRae, B. H.·2013·Ecology Letters
DOI 10.1111/ele.12132
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Historically, many species moved great distances as climates changed. However, modern movements will be limited by the patterns of human‐dominated landscapes. Here, we use a combination of projected climate‐driven shifts in the distributions of 2903 vertebrate species, estimated current human impacts on the landscape, and movement models, to determine through which areas in the western hemisphere species will likely need to move to track suitable climates. Our results reveal areas with projected high densities of climate‐driven movements – including, the Amazon Basin, the southeastern United States and southeastern Brazil. Some of these regions, such as southern Bolivia and northern Paraguay, contain relatively intact landscapes, whereas others such as the southeastern United States and Brazil are heavily impacted by human activities. Thus, these results highlight both critical areas for protecting lands that will foster movement, and barriers where human land‐use activities will likely impede climate‐driven shifts in species distributions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ele.12132

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advances in data visualization tools have assisted the communication of circuit theory results to a broader set of conservation practitioners, stakeholders, and planning efforts.

    “Similarly, advances in data visualization tools have assisted the communication of circuit theory results to a broader set of conservation practitioners, stakeholders, and planning efforts.”

    From Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2019) · cites this paper as Lawler et al. 2013

  • Lawler et al. (2013) used species distribution models to map the routes that organisms might follow to track shifting climates.

    “For example, Lawler et al. (2013) used species distribution models to map the routes that organisms might follow to track shifting climates, and Littlefield et al. (2017) mapped connections between climatic conditions today and where those conditions will be in the future (i.e., climate analogs).”

    From Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation (2019) · cites this paper as Lawler et al. (2013)

  • This global map animates Circuitscape-based trajectories for species range shift in response to change using colored lines for each species and visualizations designed for modeling wind patterns.

    “This global map animates Circuitscape-based trajectories for species range shift in response to change [198] using colored lines for each species and visualizations designed for modeling wind patterns.”

    From Circuitscape in julia: empowering dynamic approaches to connectivity assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [198]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01000.x · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482.x · DOI
  4. Batschelet E., 1981, Circular Statistics in Ecology
  5. 10.1641/B570306 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00305.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01870.x · DOI
  8. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0120 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01681.x · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0376892997000088 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gailus J., 2001, Yellowstone to Yukon, Altern. J., 27, 36
  13. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01405.x · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001439 · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1140170 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01191.x · DOI
  19. 10.1890/08-0823.1 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nature08649 · DOI
  21. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well‐being Biodiversity Synthesis
  22. 10.1002/joc.1181 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.1163428 · DOI
  24. 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0829:RTCSTC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. 10.3354/cr021001 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/cobi.12014 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/587826 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/21181 · DOI
  30. Patterson B.D., 2003, Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, Version 1.0.
  31. 10.1890/07-0507.1 · DOI
  32. Ridgely R.S., 2003, Digital Distribution Maps of Birds of the Western Hemisphere, Version 1.0.
  33. 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.1116791109 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/4088877 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00218.x · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.0409902102 · DOI
  39. WHCWG, 2010, Washington Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Working Group Connected Landscapes Project: Statewide Analysis

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lawler, J. J., Ruesch, A. S., Olden, J. D., & McRae, B. H.
Affiliations
  • School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA 98195 USA
  • School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA 98195 USA
  • The Nature Conservancy North America Region Seattle WA 98101 USA
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-19
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1014-1022
ISSN
  • 1461-023X
  • 1461-0248
DOI
10.1111/ele.12132
Cited by
179
References
5
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review