Cited by 49Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

A Ranking‐Theoretic Approach to Conditionals

Open access
Spohn, Wolfgang·2013·Cognitive Science

Abstract

Conditionals somehow express conditional beliefs. However, conditional belief is a bi‐propositional attitude that is generally not truth‐evaluable, in contrast to unconditional belief. Therefore, this article opts for an expressivistic semantics for conditionals, grounds this semantics in the arguably most adequate account of conditional belief, that is, ranking theory, and dismisses probability theory for that purpose, because probabilities cannot represent belief. Various expressive options are then explained in terms of ranking theory, with the intention to set out a general interpretive scheme that is able to account for the most variegated usage of conditionals. The Ramsey test is only the first option. Relevance is another, familiar, but little understood item, which comes in several versions. This article adds a further family of expressive options, which is able to subsume also counterfactuals and causal conditionals, and indicates at the end how this family allows for partial recovery of truth conditions for conditionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cogs.12057

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Edgington, D. (2008). Counterfactuals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 108, 1-21.
  2. Evans, J. St. B. T & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  3. G€ ardenfors, P. (1981). An epistemic approach to conditionals. American Philosophical Quarterly, 18, 203-211. 1104
  4. Harper, W. L., Stalnaker, R. C., & Pearce, G. (Eds.) (1981). Ifs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
  5. Jackson, F. (1987). Conditionals. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  6. Kyburg, H. E. jr. (1961). Probability and the logic of rational belief. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  7. Lewis, D. K. (1973a). Counterfactuals. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  8. Lewis, D. K. (1973b). Causation. Journal of Philosophy 70, 556-567. Also in Lewis (1986), pp. 159-172, supplemented by postscripts.
  9. Lewis, D. K. (1986). Philosophical Papers. Vol. II. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  10. Pearl, J. (1990). System Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning. In R. Parikh (Ed.), Proceedings TARK-90 (pp. 121-135). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  11. Ed. by D.H. Mellor. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1978.
  12. Stalnaker, R. C. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spohn, W.
Affiliations
University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Spohn, Wolfgang
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1074-1106
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2162937879
Cited by
49
References
72
Citations by year
2025: 11 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
conditionals, ranking theory, conditional beliefs, expressivism, Ramsey test, relevance, counterfactuals, causal conditionals, truth conditions, probability theory
MeSH terms
Humans, Logic, Probability Learning, Probability Theory, Semantics, Models, Statistical, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review