A Theory of Conditionals
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To approach the actionability problem, Ustun et al. employ a mixed integer programming method.
“To approach this problem, a mixed integer programming method is employed.”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
Ustun et al. tackle the problem of actionability, i.e., constraining the generated counterfactuals in such a manner that the imposed changes ''do not alter immutable features'' and that they ''do not alter mutable features in an infeasible way'' [158].
“Thus, Ustun et al. tackle the problem of actionability, i.e., constraining the generated counterfactuals in such a manner that the imposed changes ''do not alter immutable features'' and that they ''do not alter mutable features in an infeasible way'' [158].”
From A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
Cites
Madden, E. H., Goodman, N., & van Melsen, A. G. (1955) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103789 · Cited by 4,398 · see citing works
Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I Normal Modal Propositional Calculi
(1963) · doi:10.1002/malq.19630090502 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
General Propositions and Causality
Ramsey, F. P. (1931) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · Cited by 327 · see citing works
(1966) · Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics · doi:10.1016/s0049-237x(08)x7084-3 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
The Logic of Conditionals: An Application of Probability to Deductive Logic.
Nute, D. E., Mitcheltree, W., & Adams, E. W. (1981) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2215448 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
A semantic analysis of conditional logic1
STALNAKER, R. C., & Thomason, R. H. (1970) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00408.x · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationI.—THE CONTRARY-TO-FACT CONDITIONAL1
Chisholm, R. M. (1946) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lv.219.289 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
VIII.--THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL PROPOSITIONS
Burks, A. W. (1951) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lx.239.363 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Probability and the Logic of Conditionals
Adams, E. W. (1966) · Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics · doi:10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71673-2 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Mackie, J. L., & Rescher, N. (1966) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2218530 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The Logic of Causal Propositions.
Rescher, N., & Burks, A. W. (1951) · Journal of Symbolic Logic · doi:10.2307/2267926 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Tolkien, J. R. R. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Brodbeck, M. (1961) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.134.3484.997 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Mayo, B. (1957) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2182436 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference
Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009211805 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Stepin, I., Alonso, J. M., Catala, A., & Pereira-Farina, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3051315 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
The Probability Heuristics Model of Syllogistic Reasoning
Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0696 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
The probability of causal conditionals
Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.05.002 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Boutilier, C., & Beche, V. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00025-v · Cited by 118 · see citing works
A Ranking‐Theoretic Approach to Conditionals
Spohn, W. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12057 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
A Counterfactual Approach to Explanation in Mathematics
Baron, S., Colyvan, M., & Ripley, D. (2020) · Philosophia Mathematica · doi:10.1093/philmat/nkz023 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Entropy Theory of Counterfactuals
Kutach, D. N. (2002) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/338942 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stalnaker, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stalnaker, Robert C.
- Venue
- IFS
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1968
- Pages
- 41-55
- OpenAlex
- W1590902735
- Cited by
- 2,220
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 127 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 159 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 68
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- conditionals, counterfactuals, truth functions, counterfactual reasoning, conditional propositions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
