Cited by 96Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEthics and Social Impacts of AIConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

Principles for the socially responsible use of conservation monitoring technology and data

Open access
Sandbrook, Chris, Clark, Douglas, Toivonen, Tuuli, Simlai, Trishant, O'Donnell, Stephanie, Cobbe, Jennifer, Adams, William·2021·Conservation Science and Practice

Abstract

Wildlife conservation and research benefits enormously from automated and interconnected monitoring tools. Some of these tools, such as drones, remote cameras, and social media, can collect data on humans, either accidentally or deliberately. They can therefore be thought of as conservation surveillance technologies (CSTs). There is increasing evidence that CSTs, and the data they yield, can have both positive and negative impacts on people, raising ethical questions about how to use them responsibly. CST use may accelerate because of the COVID‐19 pandemic, adding urgency to addressing these ethical challenges. We propose a provisional set of principles for the responsible use of such tools and their data: (a) recognize and acknowledge CSTs can have social impacts; (b) deploy CSTs based on necessity and proportionality relative to the conservation problem; (c) evaluate all potential impacts of CSTs on people; (d) engage with and seek consent from people who may be observed and/or affected by CSTs; (e) build transparency and accountability into CST use; (f) respect peoples' rights and vulnerabilities; and (g) protect data in order to safeguard privacy. These principles require testing and could conceivably benefit conservation efforts, especially through inclusion of people likely to be affected by CSTs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/csp2.374

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current guidelines urge researchers to minimize disturbance, engage local communities, and apply necessity and proportionality tests before deploying ARUs.

    “Current guidelines urge researchers to minimize disturbance, engage local communities, and apply necessity and proportionality tests before deploying ARUs (Sandbrook et al. 2021; Teixeira et al. 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Springer, J., Campese, J., & Painter, M. (2011). Conservation and human rights: Key issues and contexts. In Conservation initiative on human rights , Gland, CH: IUCN.
  2. Takyi, S. A. (2014). Review of social impacts assessment (SIA): Approach, importance, challenges and policy implications. International Journal of Arts and Sciences , 7 , 217 -234.
  3. Väisänen, T., Heikinheimo, H., Hiippala, T., & Toivonen, T. (in press). Exploring human-nature interactions in national parks using social media photographs and computer vision. Conservation Biology .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandbrook, C., Clark, D., Toivonen, T., Simlai, T., O'Donnell, S., Cobbe, J., & Adams, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Fauna and Flora International (GB)
Corresponding author
Clark, Douglas
Venue
Conservation Science and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-03
Volume
3
Issue
5
ISSN
2578-4854 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135532769
Cited by
96
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conservation Science and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Genome Canada
  • Osk. Huttusen säätiö
  • University of Saskatchewan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
responsible technology use, privacy, data protection, informed consent, transparency and accountability, unmanned aerial vehicles, remote cameras, social media, COVID-19 pandemic, human rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review