Cited by 17Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Prospective study of a new endoscopic duodenal–jejunal bypass sleeve in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (with video)

Ren, Mengting, Zhou, Xinxin, Yu, Mosang, Cao, Yang, Xu, Chengfu, Yu, Chaohui, Ji, Feng·2023·Digestive Endoscopy

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new endoscopic duodenal–jejunal bypass sleeve (DJBS) in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), while in situ for 3 months, and at 6 months postexplantation. Methods: Patients with obesity and NAFLD were enrolled in this single‐center, prospective study, wherein the TONGEE DJBS (Tangji Medical, Hangzhou, China) was implanted for 3 months. Primary outcomes were weight loss and changes in hepatic steatosis. Secondary outcomes included changes in liver enzymes, glycemic control, and lipid profile and device safety. Results: Twenty‐six patients (age 35.2 ± 7.2 years; 61.5% women) underwent DJBS implantation. At 3 months, bodyweight change from baseline was −8.0 ± 3.6 kg (P < 0.001), corresponding to 8.9 ± 4.0% of total bodyweight. Hepatic steatosis significantly improved based on controlled attenuation parameter, hepatic steatosis index, and fatty liver index (P < 0.001). Liver enzymes, insulin resistance, and metabolic parameters were also improved. At 6 months postexplantation, weight loss and improvements in hepatic steatosis and liver enzyme levels remained statistically significant. Only one patient had a serious adverse event, namely, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Conclusions: Three‐month TONGEE DJBS implantation resulted in significant weight loss and improvement in hepatic steatosis, liver enzymes, insulin resistance, and metabolic parameters in obese patients with NAFLD. Randomized controlled trials are required to further elucidate these initial findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/den.14409

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, M., Zhou, X., Yu, M., Cao, Y., Xu, C., Yu, C., & Ji, F.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ji, Feng
Venue
Digestive Endoscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-08-23
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
58-66
ISSN
  • 0915-5635 (ISSN-L)
  • 1443-1661
OpenAlex
W4286697206
Cited by
17
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2019C03031)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, weight loss, hepatic steatosis, liver enzymes, insulin resistance, glycemic control, lipid profile, device safety, upper gastrointestinal bleeding
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Liver, Male, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Weight Loss, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review