The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model
Open accessAbstract
Evaluating individuals based on their pro‐ and anti‐social behaviors is fundamental to successful human interaction. Recent research suggests that even preverbal infants engage in social evaluation; however, it remains an open question whether infants’ judgments are driven uniquely by an analysis of the mental states that motivate others’ helpful and unhelpful actions, or whether non‐mentalistic inferences are at play. Here we present evidence from 10‐month‐olds, motivated and supported by a Bayesian computational model, for mentalistic social evaluation in the first year of life.A video abstract of this article can be viewed at http://youtu.be/rD_Ry5oqCYE
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social evaluation by preverbal infants
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06288 · Cited by 1,566
Self-citationAction Anticipation Through Attribution of False Belief by 2-Year-Olds
Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01944.x · Cited by 1,066
Attribution of Beliefs by 13-Month-Old Infants
Surian, L., Caldi, S., & Sperber, D. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01943.x · Cited by 811
Three‐month‐olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations
Kiley Hamlin, J., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x · Cited by 494
Can a Self-Propelled Box Have a Goal?: Psychological Reasoning in 5-Month-Old Infants
Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01582.x · Cited by 406 · cited 3×
“A series of studies by Luo and colleagues suggests that, rather than expecting individuals to always approach objects that they have approached before, infants selectively make preference attributions based on the presence or absence of alternative target objects (e.g., Luo, 2010; Luo and Baillargeon, 2005; 2007; Luo…”
Do 12. 5-month-old infants consider what objects others can see when interpreting their actions?
Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.007 · Cited by 263 · cited 2×
“…individuals to always approach objects that they have approached before, infants selectively make preference attributions based on the presence or absence of alternative target objects (e.g., Luo, 2010; Luo and Baillargeon, 2005; 2007; Luo and Johnson, 2009; see also Kushnir, Xu, & Wellman, 2010).”
Recognizing the role of perception in action at 6 months
Luo, Y., & Johnson, S. C. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00741.x · Cited by 204
Children's use of intention cues in evaluating behavior.
Karniol, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.76 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550
Self-citationFriston, K., & Frith, C. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.003 · Cited by 359
Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions
Liu, S., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Spelke, E. S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2132 · Cited by 230
Self-citationLearning a commonsense moral theory
Kleiman-Weiner, M., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005 · Cited by 53
Self-citationRe-evaluating Theory of Mind evaluation in large language models
Hu, J., Sosa, F., & Ullman, T. (2025) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0499 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiley Hamlin, J., Ullman, T., Tenenbaum, J., Goodman, N., & Baker, C.
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-226
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2006811589
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 26.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
