The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training in children and adults
Open accessAbstract
Response inhibition is crucial for mental and physical health but studies assessing the trainability of this type of inhibition are rare. Thirty‐nine children aged 10‐12 years and 46 adults aged 18‐24 years were assigned to an adaptive go/no‐go inhibition training condition or an active control condition. Transfer of training effects to performance on tasks assessing response inhibition, interference control, working memory updating, task‐switching, and non‐verbal fluid intelligence were assessed during 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐up sessions and/or an immediate post‐training session. Significant training improvements and positive transfer effects to a similar response inhibition task with other stimuli were observed for both children and adults. Reliable albeit short‐lived transfer effects were only found for the children, specifically to working memory updating and task switching. These results suggest some potential for response‐inhibition training programs to enhance aspects of cognitive functioning in children but not adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Children and adolescents – those undergoing neurocognitive development – often show larger or more efficient transfer (Liu et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2018)”
From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641
(1998) · Cited by 4,172
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 · Cited by 3,944
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010 · Cited by 3,197
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x · Cited by 3,140
A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x · Cited by 2,692
Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B., & Yiend, J. (1997) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00015-8 · Cited by 2,189
Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control and Children's Theory of Mind
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00333 · Cited by 2,072
Nigg, J. T. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220 · Cited by 1,941
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Logan G.D., 1994, Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language: A users’ guide to the Stop Signal paradigm
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Wang, Z., Qi, S., Wang, R., & Hu, W. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102417
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., Chen, L., & Maes, J. H. R.
- Affiliations
- Northwest Normal University (CN)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Maes, Joseph H.R.
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12-13
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2565499108
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300838, 31560283)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- response inhibition, cognitive training, transfer of training, go/no-go task, children, adults, working memory updating, task switching, interference control, fluid intelligence, cognitive aging, cognitive development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Cognition, Education, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Reaction Time, Transfer, Psychology, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
