Cited by 2,692Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function

Open access
Best, John R, Miller, Patricia H·2010·Child Development

Abstract

This review article examines theoretical and methodological issues in the construction of a developmental perspective on executive function (EF) in childhood and adolescence. Unlike most reviews of EF, which focus on preschoolers, this review focuses on studies that include large age ranges. It outlines the development of the foundational components of EF—inhibition, working memory, and shifting. Cognitive and neurophysiological assessments show that although EF emerges during the first few years of life, it continues to strengthen significantly throughout childhood and adolescence. The components vary somewhat in their developmental trajectories. The article relates the findings to long-standing issues of development (e.g., developmental sequences, trajectories, and processes) and suggests research needed for constructing a developmental framework encompassing early childhood through adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory (specifically updating and monitoring), attention, and emotional control coalesce into executive function.

    “WM—specifically updating and monitoring—attention, and emotional control coalesce into EF (Roth et al., 2005; Best & Miller, 2010), and are all are strained by overused social media.”

    From The Relationship Between TikTok Usage and Executive Function Is Mediated by Problematic Social Media Use (2025) · cites this paper as Best & Miller, 2010

    In “Theoretical and Methodological Challenges” (page not provided), the paper identifies information updating and monitoring (working memory) as a foundational executive function and discusses the anterior attention system’s role in regulating other brain networks. It does not identify emotional control as one of the foundational functions; its discussion of socioemotional influences in “Inhibition” does not establish that part of the claimed grouping. The social-media assertion follows the citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Frontal lobe capacity for internally guided behavior, working memory, and organizational skills does not reach full adult functional capacity until mid to late adolescence.

    “the frontal lobe capacity for internally guided behavior, working memory, and organizational skills do not reach full adult functional capacity until mid to late adolescence.8, 9, 10, 11, 12”

    From A role for synaptic plasticity in the adolescent development of executive function (2013) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Working Memory section (page not provided) reports improvement through adolescence, with performance on some demanding tasks continuing to improve into adulthood. The Theoretical and Methodological Challenges section (page not provided) says the prefrontal cortex matures later in adolescence. These passages support prolonged development, but not a single mid-to-late-adolescent point of full adult functional capacity for all three named abilities, particularly internally guided behavior and organizational skills. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Complex inhibitory control tasks require integration of multiple cognitive processes including working memory, so simple tasks may more purely reflect inhibitory control.

    “Given that complex inhibitory control tasks require the integration of multiple cognitive processes, including working memory, simple tasks may more purely reflect inhibitory control (Best & Miller, 2010).”

    From Inhibitory control and working memory in post-institutionalized children (2013) · cites this paper as Best & Miller, 2010

  • Under typical family rearing conditions, inhibitory control and working memory emerge in the first year of life and develop rapidly over early childhood.

    “Under typical family rearing conditions, inhibitory control and working memory emerge in the first year of life and develop rapidly over the course of early childhood (Best & Miller, 2010; Garon, Bryson, & Smith, 2008; Hughes, 2011; Rueda, Posner, & Rothbart, 2005).”

    From Inhibitory control and working memory in post-institutionalized children (2013) · cites this paper as Best & Miller, 2010

  • Inhibitory control develops rapidly during the preschool years and typically continues to improve into middle childhood.

    “Inhibitory control develops rapidly during the preschool years and typically continues to improve into middle childhood (Kray et al., 2009, 2012; Best and Miller, 2010).”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Best and Miller, 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Patricia H
Venue
Child Development
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
1641-1660
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1685870920
Cited by
2,692
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 315 · 2025: 214 · 2024: 221 · 2023: 260 · 2022: 210 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 229 · 2019: 165 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 107 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 60
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL087923)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK70922-01, R01DK070922)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
executive function, developmental trajectories, inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, childhood, adolescence, early childhood, neurophysiological assessment, cognitive assessment, developmental sequence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress, Psychological, Adolescent Development, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review