Cited by 13Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologySuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Links between screen use and depressive symptoms in adolescents over 16 years: Is there evidence for increased harm?

Ferguson, Christopher J.·2021·Developmental Science

Abstract

Recent scholarship has been divided on whether an observed increase in suicides in the United States among teenagers and preteens (12-18) can be attributed to an increased use in social screen media beginning in 2009. If these concerns are accurate effect sizes for the relationship between screen use and suicide should increase over the 16 years since 2001. The current study used the Florida Youth Risk Behavior Survey data (n = 45,992) from 2001 to 2017, to track effect sizes for screen/depression correlations, controlling for age and gender. A second dataset from the UK Understanding Society dataset (ns for each wave ranged between 3,536 and 4,850) was used to study associations between time spent on social media and emotional problems. Metaregression was be used to examine whether effect sizes increase across time. Results generally did not support the hypothesis that effect sizes between screen and social media use are increasing over time. Aside from the trends over time, for any given year, most effect sizes were below the r = .10 threshold used for interpretation with the exception of computer use which was just at that threshold. It is concluded that screens and social media use are unlikely to bear major responsibility for youth suicide trends. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76S7cxiaU88.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.13008

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-sectional and correlational trend analyses appear to show increases in depression rates alongside increased social media engagement.

    “Cross-sectional and correlational trend analyses appear to show increases in depression rates alongside increased social media engagement [(9, 11–14); also see (15), for a contrasting result].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, C. J.
Affiliations
Stetson University (US)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Christopher J.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-05
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
e13008-e13008
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W3038001842
Cited by
13
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
screen use, social media use, depressive symptoms, adolescents, youth suicide, computer use, Understanding Society, emotional problems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Computers, Depression, Humans, Risk-Taking, Suicide, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review