The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost of diabetic foot disease to the National Health Service in England
Abstract
Aim: To estimate the annual cost of diabetic foot care in a universal healthcare system. Methods: National datasets and economic modelling were used to estimate the cost of diabetic foot disease to the National Health Service in England in 2010–2011. The cost of hospital admissions specific to foot disease or amputation was estimated from Hospital Episode Statistics and national tariffs. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the impact of foot disease on length of stay in admissions that were not specific to foot disease or amputation. Costs in other areas were estimated from published studies and data from individual hospitals. Results: The cost of diabetic foot care in 2010–2011 is estimated at £580m, almost 0.6% of National Health Service expenditure in England. We estimate that more than half this sum (£307m) was spent on care for ulceration in primary and community settings. Of hospital admissions with recorded diabetes, 8.8% included ulcer care or amputation. Regression analysis suggests that foot disease was associated with a 2.51‐fold (95% CI 2.43–2.59) increase in length of stay.The cost of inpatient ulcer care is estimated at £219 m, and that of amputation care at £55 m. Conclusions: The cost of diabetic foot disease is substantial. Ignorance of the cost of current care may hinder commissioning of effective services for prevention and management in both community and secondary care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Variation in the recorded incidence of amputation of the lower limb in England
Holman, N., Young, R. J., & Jeffcoate, W. J. (2012) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2468-6 · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Cited by
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1615439 · Cited by 4,376
Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3 · Cited by 1,020
Evaluating Digital Health Interventions
Murray, E., Hekler, E. B., Andersson, G., Collins, L. M., Doherty, A., Hollis, C., Rivera, D. E., West, R., & Wyatt, J. C. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008 · Cited by 847
Prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
Lim, J. Z. M., Ng, N. S. L., & Thomas, C. (2017) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/0141076816688346 · Cited by 486
The current burden of diabetic foot disease
Edmonds, M., Manu, C., & Vas, P. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma · doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2021.01.017 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerr, M., Rayman, G., & Jeffcoate, W. J.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1498-1504
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2029237278
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost of diabetic foot disease to the National Health Service in England. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/dme.12545
- The paper
- Kerr, M., Rayman, G., & Jeffcoate, W. J. (2014). Cost of diabetic foot disease to the National Health Service in England. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12545
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.