Cited by 155Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

A meta‐analysis comparing clinical effects of short‐ or long‐acting GLP ‐1 receptor agonists versus insulin treatment from head‐to‐head studies in type 2 diabetic patients

Abd El Aziz, Mirna S., Kahle, Melanie, Meier, Juris J., Nauck, Michael A.·2017·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims To study differences in clinical outcomes between initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RAs) vs insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral glucose-lowering medications (OGLM). Methods Prospective, randomized trials comparing GLP-1 RA and insulin treatment head-to-head as add-on to OGLM were identified (PubMed). Differences from baseline values were compared for HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, bodyweight, blood pressure, heartrate and lipoproteins. Proportions of patients reporting hypoglycaemic episodes were compared. Results Of 712 publications identified, 23 describing 19 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to insulin, GLP-1 RAs reduced HbA1c more effectively (Δ -.12%, P Conclusions Slightly better glycaemic control can be achieved by adding GLP-1 RAs to OGLM as compared to insulin treatment, with added benefits regarding bodyweight, hypoglycaemia, blood pressure and lipoproteins. These differences are in contrast to the fact that insulin is prescribed far more often than GLP-1 RAs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.12804

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis comparing GLP-1 receptor agonists with insulins in patients with T2D found improvements in blood pressure and atherogenic lipid levels and a reduced rate of hypoglycemia for GLP-1 receptor agonist users.

    “A meta-analysis comparing the GLP-1 receptor agonists with insulins in patients with T2D found improvements in blood pressure and atherogenic lipid levels and a reduced rate of hypoglycemia for the GLP-1 receptor agonist users.23”
  • In trials analyzing addition of injectable GLP-1 RA, dual GIP and GLP-1 RA, or insulin in people needing further glucose lowering, glycemic efficacies of GLP-1 RAs and the dual GIP and GLP-1 RA were similar to or greater than that of basal insulin.

    “In trials analyzing the addition of an injectable GLP-1 RA, dual GIP and GLP-1 RA, or insulin in people needing further glucose lowering, glycemic efficacies of GLP-1 RAs and the dual GIP and GLP-1 RA were similar to or greater than that of basal insulin (123-130).”
  • GLP-1 RAs and dual GIP and GLP-1 RA in these trials had a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with insulin.

    “GLP-1 RAs and dual GIP and GLP-1 RA in these trials also had a lower risk of hypoglycemia and beneficial effects on body weight compared with insulin, albeit with greater gastrointestinal side effects.”
  • GLP-1 RAs and dual GIP and GLP-1 RA in these trials had greater gastrointestinal side effects compared with insulin.

    “GLP-1 RAs and dual GIP and GLP-1 RA in these trials also had a lower risk of hypoglycemia and beneficial effects on body weight compared with insulin, albeit with greater gastrointestinal side effects.”
  • GLP-1 RAs and dual GIP and GLP-1 RA in these trials had beneficial effects on body weight compared with insulin.

    “GLP-1 RAs and dual GIP and GLP-1 RA in these trials also had a lower risk of hypoglycemia and beneficial effects on body weight compared with insulin, albeit with greater gastrointestinal side effects.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abd El Aziz, M. S., Kahle, M., Meier, J. J., & Nauck, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Division of Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine I, St. Josef‐Hospital Ruhr‐University Bochum Bochum Germany
  • St. Josef-Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Nauck, Michael A.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-29
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
216-227
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2527920149
Cited by
155
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, insulin therapy, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, body weight, hypoglycemia, blood pressure, heart rate, lipoproteins, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Exenatide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fasting, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Peptides, Venoms, Treatment Outcome, Incretins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review