Cited by 86Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Largest single-centre experience of dulaglutide for management of diabetes mellitus in solid organ transplant recipients

Singh, Priyamvada, Pesavento, Todd E., Washburn, Kenneth, Walsh, Debbie, Meng, Shumei·2019·Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Published data regarding the approach to management of diabetes mellitus in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are limited. We performed a retrospective chart review of SOT recipients with diabetes, above 18 years of age, who were usisng dulaglutide. There was a sustained, statistically significant reduction in the primary endpoints of weight, body mass index (BMI) and insulin requirement in 63 SOT recipients at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. A total of 59, 50 and 13 recipients were followed during 6, 12 and 24 months, with a mean paired difference for weight reduction of 2.07 ( P value <0.003), 4.007 ( P value <0.001) and 5.23 ( P value <0.034) kgs and a BMI reduction of 0.80 ( P value <0.001), 1.35 ( P value <0.005) and 2.015 ( P value <0.045) kg/m 2 , respectively. The mean paired difference for insulin reduction before and after dulaglutide treatment was 5.94 units ( P value <0.0002). There was no increased risk of malignancy, cardiovascular morbidity, graft‐failure or all‐cause mortality. Gastrointestinal manifestations were rare, even in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), and required no change in immunosuppressive agents. Thus, dulaglutide may be considered an important option for diabetes management in SOT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.13619

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, P., Pesavento, T. E., Washburn, K., Walsh, D., & Meng, S.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Singh, Priyamvada
Venue
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-20
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1061-1065
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2904047928
Cited by
86
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Keywords
dulaglutide, diabetes mellitus, solid organ transplant recipients, weight loss, body mass index, insulin requirement, gastrointestinal adverse effects, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppressants, graft failure, mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Immunosuppressive Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Heart Transplantation, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Organ Transplantation, Incretins, Transplant Recipients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review