Cited by 423SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesViral Infections and Outbreaks Research

The novel Chinese coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections: Challenges for fighting the storm.

Open access
Bassetti, Matteo, Vena, Antonio, Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto·2020·European Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Since end of December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown origin was reported from Wuhan, Hubei province, China.1 They shared a connection with the Huanan South China Seafood Market in Wuhan, and now it has been confirmed that the disease is caused by a novel coronavirus (provisionally named 2019-nCoV).1 As of today (30 January 2020), 7734 cases have been confirmed in China, and 90 cases have also been cumulatively reported from Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Japan, Singapore, Republic of Korea, United Arab Emirate, United States, The Philippines, India, Australia, Canada, Finland, France and Germany (Finland, France and Germany are the only European countries in which cases [n = 1, n = 5, and n = 4, respectively] have been reported up to date). According to the released news, the case rate fatality is 2.2% (170/7824).2 Coronavirus are enveloped, positive-strand RNA viruses, that may be transmitted to humans from intermediate hosts (usually peridomestic mammals) and with bats being the likely reservoir of most of them, in view of the observed virus diversity.3 The 2019-nCoV is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans. Four (229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1) are responsible for mild upper respiratory tract infections (common cold), whereas the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV, which has been contained4) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are able to cause atypical pneumonia.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eci.13209

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bassetti, M., Vena, A., & Giacobbe, D. R.
Affiliations
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
Corresponding author
Bassetti, Matteo
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-05
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
e13209-e13209
ISSN
  • 0014-2972 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2362
OpenAlex
W3004412595
Cited by
423
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 197 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, novel coronavirus, Wuhan, virus transmission, ACE2 receptor, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, bats as reservoir, intermediate hosts, phylogenetic analysis, case fatality, epidemic control, public health response, travel restrictions
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review