Cited by 69Dental Trauma and TreatmentsEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsFacial Trauma and Fracture Management

Cvek pulpotomy – revisited

Open access
Bimstein, Enrique, Rotstein, Ilan·2016·Dental Traumatology

Abstract

Background/Aim: While some studies support the notion that the time elapsed from coronal fracture and treatment with Cvek pulpotomy in permanent teeth plays an important role in minimizing the possibility of pain and discomfort, microbial pulp invasion, and ensuring pulp and periodontal healing, others consider that neither time between the accident and treatment nor size of exposure is critical if the inflamed superficial pulp tissue is amputated to the level of a healthy pulp. This study compares published data in an attempt to assess whether the outcome of Cvek pulpotomies is affected by these factors. Results and conclusions: Evidence in the literature suggests to treat a permanent tooth with a complicated crown fracture as soon as possible to diminish the possibility of pain and prevent necrosis and infection of the pulp. Delay of treatment by 9 days or less may have minimal effect on the outcome of Cvek pulpotomies. While the literature indicates that pulp exposures of 4 mm or less may have a good prognosis after a Cvek pulpotomy, the prognosis in teeth with pulp exposures of more than 4 mm has not yet been clarified. Although the literature is not conclusive regarding a difference in the outcomes of Cvek pulpotomies in teeth with open or closed apices, it appears that teeth with open apices have a better prognosis. The outcome of a Cvek pulpotomy may be compromised by a luxation injury that diminishes the tooth's blood supply and innervation. A good restoration that prevents bacterial penetration into the tooth is essential for the success of a Cvek pulpotomy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/edt.12297

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pulp exposures secondary to traumatic dental injuries are amenable to conservative pulp therapies such as pulp capping, partial pulpotomy, shallow or partial pulpotomy and cervical pulpotomy, which aim to maintain the pulp and allow continued root development.

    “Pulp exposures secondary to TDIs are amenable to conservative pulp therapies, such as pulp capping, partial pulpotomy, shallow or partial pulpotomy and cervical pulpotomy, which aim to maintain the pulp and allow for continued root development. 29-32”

    From International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations. (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pulp exposures secondary to traumatic dental injuries are amenable to conservative pulp therapies, such as pulp capping, partial pulpotomy, shallow or partial pulpotomy and cervical pulpotomy, which aim to maintain the pulp and allow for continued root development.

    “Pulp exposures secondary to TDIs are amenable to conservative pulp therapies, such as pulp capping, partial pulpotomy, shallow or partial pulpotomy and cervical pulpotomy, which aim to maintain the pulp and allow for continued root development. 29-32”

    From International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations. (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. Malone AJ, Massler M. Fractured anterior teeth -diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Dent Dig 1952;58:442-7.
  2. [9]9. Cvek M. Partial pulpotomy in crown-fractured incisors-results 3-15 years after trauma. Acta Stomatol Croat 1993;27:167-73.
  3. [16]16. Sudo C. A study on partial pulp removal (pulpotomy) using NaOCl (sodium hypochlorite). J Jpn Stomatol Soc 1959;26:1012-24.
  4. [28]28. Heide S. Pulp reactions to exposure for 4, 24 and 168 hours. J Dent Res (Special issue D, Part I, Abstract # 56) 1980;59:1910.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bimstein, E., & Rotstein, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Bimstein, Enrique
Venue
Dental Traumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-10
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
438-442
ISSN
  • 1600-4469 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-9657
OpenAlex
W2462106574
Cited by
69
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dental Traumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Dental Trauma and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Keywords
crown fracture, permanent teeth, pulp exposure, pulp necrosis, pulp healing, treatment timing, open apex, tooth luxation, dental trauma
MeSH terms
Dental Pulp, Dental Pulp Exposure, Humans, Pulpotomy, Tooth Fractures, Treatment Outcome, Dentition, Permanent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review