Cited by 90Dental Trauma and TreatmentsDelphi Technique in ResearchFacial Trauma and Fracture Management

What are the important outcomes in traumatic dental injuries? An international approach to the development of a core outcome set

Open access
Kenny, Kate P., Day, Peter F., Sharif, Mohammad O., Parashos, Peter, Lauridsen, Eva, Feldens, Carlos Alberto, Cohenca, Nestor, Skapetis, Tony +7 more·2018·Dental Traumatology

Abstract

Background/Aims: There are numerous treatment options following traumatic dental injury (TDI). Systematic reviews of different treatments are challenging owing to the diversity of outcomes reported between clinical studies. This issue could be addressed through the development and implementation of a agreed and standardized collection of outcomes known as a core outcome set (COS). The aim of this study was to develop a COS for TDI in children and adults. The secondary aim was to establish what, how, when and by whom these outcomes should be measured. Materials and Method: The project was registered with Core Outcomes Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET). A web‐based survey was developed to capture the opinions of dentists globally as to which outcomes should be recorded. A list of outcomes was entered into a Delphi Survey and scored by an Expert Working Group (EWG). The scoring was repeated, followed by conference calls to discuss, refine and finalize the COS. The EWG split into small groups of subject‐specific experts to determine how, when and by whom each outcome would be measured. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 1476 dentists. The EWG identified 13 core outcomes to be recorded for all TDI's. An additional 10 injury‐specific outcomes were identified. A table has been produced for each outcome detailing what, when, and how each outcome should be recorded. Conclusions: A robust consensus process was used to develop an international COS for TDI in children and adults. This includes both generic and injury‐specific outcomes across all identified domains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/edt.12367

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [25]25. Robertson A, Noren JG. Subjective aspects of patients with traumatised teeth. A fifteen year follow-up study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1997; 55:3
  2. [26]26. Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2002; 12: 47-52
  3. [27]27. Howard KE, Freeman R. Reliability and validity of a faces version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2007; 17:281-288
  4. [28]28. Kaakko T, Murtomaa H. Factors predictive of anxiety before oral surgery: efficacy of various subject screening measures. Anesth Prog 1999; 46:3-9
  5. [29]29. Locker D, Shapiro D, Liddell A: Who is dentally anxious? Concordance between measures of dental anxiety. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 346-350
  6. [30]30. Kleinknecht RA, Thorndike RM, McGlynn FD, Harkavy J. Factor analysis of the dental fear survey and cross-validation. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108:59-61
  7. [31]31. Corah NL. Development of a dental anxiety scale. J Dent Res 1969;48:596-

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenny, K. P., Day, P. F., Sharif, M. O., Parashos, P., Lauridsen, E., Feldens, C. A., Cohenca, N., Skapetis, T., Levin, L., Kenny, D. J., Djemal, S., Malmgren, O., Chen, Y., Tsukisboshi, M., & Andersson, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Croydon University Hospital (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Universidade Luterana do Brasil (BR)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • Orthodontic Clinic, Tandregleringen Huddinge, Stockholm Sweden
  • State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology Department of General Dentistry and Emergency School of Stomatology The Fourth Military Medical University Xian China
  • Tsukiboshi Dental Clinic Aichi Japan
  • Kuwait University (KW)
Corresponding author
Kenny, Kate P.
Venue
Dental Traumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-16
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
4-11
ISSN
  • 1600-4469 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-9657
OpenAlex
W2751794192
Cited by
90
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dental Traumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Dental Trauma and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Keywords
dental trauma, core outcome set, outcome measurement, children, adults, expert consensus, dentist survey, outcome reporting standardization
MeSH terms
Delphi Technique, Humans, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Tooth Injuries, Endpoint Determination, Consensus, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review