Cited by 288Delphi Technique in ResearchMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes

Williamson, Paula, Altman, Douglas, Blazeby, Jane, Clarke, Michael, Gargon, Elizabeth·2012·Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011131

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The systematic development and adoption of a common set of key trial outcomes for a given health condition can help to deter selective reporting of outcomes.

    “The systematic development and adoption of a common set of key trial outcomes for a given health condition can help to deter selective reporting of outcomes and facilitate comparisons and pooling of results across trials in a meta-analysis,263 264 helping to reduce research waste.”
  • The systematic development and adoption of a common set of key trial outcomes for a given health condition can facilitate comparisons and pooling of results across trials in a meta-analysis, helping to reduce research waste.

    “The systematic development and adoption of a common set of key trial outcomes for a given health condition can help to deter selective reporting of outcomes and facilitate comparisons and pooling of results across trials in a meta-analysis,263 264 helping to reduce research waste.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, P., Altman, D., Blazeby, J., Clarke, M., & Gargon, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast
Corresponding author
Williamson, Paula
Venue
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
2012-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
1-2
ISSN
  • 1355-8196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1060
OpenAlex
W2328393094
Cited by
288
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/J004847/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
core outcome set, outcome measurement, research quality, research relevance, outcome reporting
MeSH terms
Health Services Research, Quality Control, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review