Cited by 18Mental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Who is @ease? Visitors' characteristics and working method of professionally supported peer-to-peer youth walk-in centres, anonymous and free of charge

Open access
Leijdesdorff, Sophie M. J., Rosema, Stefanie, Klaassen, Rianne M. C., Popma, Arne, van Amelsvoort, Therese·2022·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Aim: Although mental disorders often emerge early in life, only a minority of young people receive timely and appropriate mental health care. A worldwide youth mental health movement aims to prevent development and persistence of psychiatric disorders. As part of this movement, the first four @ease centres were opened in the Netherlands. @ease is a youth driven, professionally supported initiative, providing peer‐to‐peer counselling, anonymous and free of charge, for people aged 12–25. Methods: Data consist of a detailed description of the working method of @ease, combined with characteristics of all young people accessing the services between its inception (January 2018) and July 2020. Results: Young‐adult peers, including experts by experience, served as counsellors after training in listening, motivational interviewing and solution‐focused strategies. They were supervised by a diverse group of healthcare professionals. A total of 291 visitors, aged 21 on average, were satisfied to very satisfied with @ease's services. Psychosocial distress, social functioning and quality of life measures at first visit showed moderate to severe levels of impairment, and almost half of all visitors reported skipping classes. One third reported parental mental illness, 28% suicidal ideations, and 11% had made specific plans. Less than a third of visitors had received mental health care in the 3 months prior to their visit. Conclusion: This study showed the need for and feasibility of a youth driven, professionally supported organization offering peer‐to‐peer counselling in the Netherlands. Its flexible and individualized working method enables @ease to normalize problems when possible and intervene when necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/eip.13294

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Friendship Bench concept is the best known example of using human resources to build context-appropriate mental health care; use of volunteers and peer workers in new youth primary care services has been a creative response to difficulty assembling professional clinical workforces even in high-resource settings.

    “The Friendship Bench concept 390 is the best known example of this strategy; however, the use of volunteers and peer workers in new youth primary care services has been a creative response to the difficulty in assembling professional clinical workforces and structures that occurs even in high-resource settings.”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [296]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Independent and in-house evaluations have found that integrated youth mental health-care services are associated with high satisfaction rates among young people.

    “Independent and in-house evaluations have found that integrated youth mental health-care services are associated with high satisfaction rates among young people, 288,296,306,310,313 are cost-effective, 288 and offer a range of benefits: increased help-seeking behaviours and enhanced access to care; inclusion of marginalised and at-risk populations such as Indigenous people and LGB”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [296]

  • In @ease Netherlands, there is high diversity and complexity of need at entry.

    “High diversity and complexity of need at entry”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [296]

  • In @ease Netherlands, there was statistically significant improvement in symptoms and functioning post-treatment.

    “statistically significant improvement in symptoms and functioning post-treatment”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [296]

    The Results report psychosocial distress and social functioning at visitors’ first @ease visit, not changes after treatment. A search for post-treatment improvement and follow-up outcomes found no passage reporting a statistical comparison of symptoms or functioning. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In @ease Netherlands, 33·3% of users improved clinically and 39·6% reliably improved (SOFAS); 43·2% improved to a better clinical category and 28·4% improved reliably (CORE-10).

    “33·3% of users improved clinically and 39·6% reliably improved (SOFAS); 43·2% improved to a better clinical category and 28·4% improved reliably (CORE-10)”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [296]

    The Results (@ease questionnaire data; page unavailable) report visitors’ CORE-10 and SOFAS scores, but not changes in those scores or rates of clinical or reliable improvement. The paper’s 28.4% figure refers to visitors who expressed suicidal thoughts, not CORE-10 improvement. Searches for the four claimed improvement percentages and follow-up outcomes found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ansell, D. I., & Insley, S. E. (2013). Youth peer‐to‐peer support: A review of the literature. Youth MOVE National, Ed.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leijdesdorff, S. M. J., Rosema, S., Klaassen, R. M. C., Popma, A., & van Amelsvoort, T.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Levvel (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS) Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Leijdesdorff, Sophie M. J.
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-27
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1391-1397
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W4220793613
Cited by
18
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
youth mental health, walk-in centres, service attributes, service delivery models, expert by experience, motivational interviewing, psychosocial distress, suicidal ideation, parental mental illness, help-seeking, service satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Counseling, Health Personnel, Humans, Peer Group, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review