Cited by 40

Endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated upregulation of miR-29a enhances sensitivity to neuronal apoptosis

Nolan, Katie, Walter, Franziska, Tuffy, Liam P., Poeschel, Simone, Gallagher, Ross, Haunsberger, Stefan, Bray, Isabella, Stallings, Raymond L. +2 more·2016·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Disturbance of homeostasis within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen leads to the accumulation of unfolded and misfolded proteins. This results in the activation of an evolutionary conserved stress response termed ER stress that, if unresolved, induces apoptosis. Previously the Bcl‐2 homology domain 3‐Only Protein Puma was identified as a mediator of ER stress‐induced apoptosis in neurons. In the search of alternative contributors to ER stress‐induced apoptosis, a downregulation of the anti‐apoptotic Bcl‐2 family protein Mcl‐1 was noted during ER stress in both mouse cortical neurons and human SH‐SY 5Y neuroblastoma cells. Downregulation of Mcl‐1 was associated with an upregulation of micro RNA‐29a (miR‐29a) expression, and subsequent experiments showed that miR‐29a targeted the 3′‐untranslated region of the anti‐apoptotic Bcl‐2 family protein, Mcl‐1. Inhibition of miR‐29a expression using sequence‐specific antagomirs or the overexpression of Mcl‐1 decreased cell death following tunicamycin treatment, while gene silencing of Mcl‐1 increased cell death. miR‐29a did not alter the signalling branches of the ER stress response, rather its expression was controlled by the ER stress‐induced transcription factor activating‐transcription‐factor‐4 (ATF 4). The current data demonstrate that the ATF 4‐mediated upregulation of miR‐29a enhances the sensitivity of neurons to ER stress‐induced apoptosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejn.13160

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nolan, K., Walter, F., Tuffy, L. P., Poeschel, S., Gallagher, R., Haunsberger, S., Bray, I., Stallings, R. L., Concannon, C. G., & Prehn, J. H. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre for the Study of Neurological Disorders and Department of Physiology and Medical Physics Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 123 St. Stephens Green Dublin 2 Ireland
  • Cancer Genetics Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-09
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
640-652
ISSN
  • 0953-816X
  • 1460-9568
Cited by
40
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (12/COEN/18, 08/IN.1/1949, 13/IA/1881)
  • Health Research Board (PHD/2007/11)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review