Cited by 115Education during COVID-19 pandemicEducational Assessment and ImprovementCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

The potential impact of COVID-19 on student learning and how schools can respond

Open access
Wyse, Adam E., Stickney, Eric M., Butz, David, Beckler, Amanda, Close, Catherine N.·2020·Educational Measurement Issues and Practice

Abstract

Abstract There is no denying the impact that the coronravirus disease (COVID‐19) outbreak has had on many aspects of our lives. This article looks at the potential impact of COVID‐19 on student learning as schools abruptly morphed into virtual learning environments using data from several instructional, practice, and assessment solutions offered by Renaissance. First, three hypothetical learning scenarios are considered using normative data from Star assessments to explore the potential impact on reading and math test performace. Next, data on Focus Skills are used to highlight which grades may have missed the most foundational math and reading content if instruction was stopped or reduced. Last, data from two of Renaissance's practice tools are used to evaluate whether students were practicing key skills following school closures. The article concludes that academic decline will likely occur but may be tempered by the increased use of practice tools; effects may look different for math and reading; and may impact grades and schools differently. As such, schools may need to leverage decision‐making frameworks, such as the Multi‐tiered Systems of Support/Response‐to‐Intervention (MTSS/RTI) framework, more than ever to identify needs and target instruction where it matters most when school begins in fall 2020.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/emip.12357

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A learning loss of up to 38 points on the PISA scale is estimated, corresponding to an effect size of 0.38 or 0.9 school years.

    “A learning loss of up to 38 points on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA1) scale is estimated, which corresponds to an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.38 or 0.9 school years (Azevedo et al., 2020; Kuhfeld et al., 2020a; Wyse et al., 2020; Kaffenberger, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyse, A. E., Stickney, E. M., Butz, D., Beckler, A., & Close, C. N.
Affiliations
  • Renaissance Arden Hills
  • Renaissance Madison WI
Venue
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-23
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
60-64
ISSN
  • 0731-1745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3992
OpenAlex
W3045390397
Cited by
115
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 1
FWCI
35.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Measurement Issues and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, school closures, student learning loss, virtual learning, reading achievement, mathematics achievement, practice tools, multi-tiered systems of support, Response to Intervention, academic decline, Renaissance education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review