Cited by 72Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersStuttering Research and Treatment

European Society for the study of Tourette syndrome 2022 criteria for clinical diagnosis of functional tic-like behaviours: international consensus from experts in tic disorders

Open access
Pringsheim, Tamara, Ganos, Christos, Nilles, Christelle, Cavanna, Andrea E., Gilbert, Donald L., Greenberg, Erica, Hartmann, Andreas, Hedderly, Tammy +16 more·2023·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background and purpose: In 2020, health professionals witnessed a dramatic increase in referrals of young people with rapid onset of severe tic‐like behaviours. We assembled a working group to develop criteria for the clinical diagnosis of functional tic‐like behaviours (FTLBs) to help neurologists, pediatricians, psychiatrists, and psychologists recognize and diagnose this condition. Methods: We used a formal consensus development process, using a multiround, web‐based Delphi survey. The survey was based on an in‐person discussion at the European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome (ESSTS) meeting in Lausanne in June 2022. Members of an invited group with extensive clinical experience working with patients with Tourette syndrome and FTLBs discussed potential clinical criteria for diagnosis of FTLBs. An initial set of criteria were developed based on common clinical experiences and review of the literature on FTLBs and revised through iterative discussions, resulting in the survey items for voting. Results: In total, 24 members of the working group were invited to participate in the Delphi process. We propose that there are three major criteria and two minor criteria to support the clinical diagnosis of FTLBs. A clinically definite diagnosis of FTLBs can be confirmed by the presence of all three major criteria. A clinically probable diagnosis of FTLBs can be confirmed by the presence of two major criteria and one minor criterion. Conclusions: Distinguishing FTLBs from primary tics is important due to the distinct treatment paths required for these two conditions. A limitation of the ESSTS 2022 criteria is that they lack prospective testing of their sensitivity and specificity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ene.15672

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of stress and anxiety in precipitating and maintaining complex tic presentations has been previously reported.

    “The role of stress and anxiety in precipitating and maintaining complex tic presentations has been previously reported (12, 20, 21).”

    From Integrated cognitive behavioral intervention for functional tics (I-CBiT): case reports and treatment formulation (2023) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes anxiety and depression as possible triggers of rapid-onset functional tic-like behaviours. The Discussion (page unavailable) says treating these comorbidities appears important for symptom improvement, but it does not establish that stress and anxiety maintain complex tic presentations generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All cases met criteria for FTLBs based on current guidelines.

    “All cases presented to our clinic between 2019 and 2023 and met criteria for FTLBs based on current guidelines (12).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]22. Isaacs K, Johnson M, Kao E, et al. Childhood Disorders, another perspective. In: Hallet M, Lang A, Jankovic J, et al., eds. Psychogenic Movement Disorders & Other Conversion Disorders. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 2011:56-58.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pringsheim, T., Ganos, C., Nilles, C., Cavanna, A. E., Gilbert, D. L., Greenberg, E., Hartmann, A., Hedderly, T., Heyman, I., Liang, H., Malaty, I., Malik, O., Debes, N. M., Vahl, K. M., Munchau, A., Murphy, T., Nagy, P., Owen, T., Rizzo, R., Skov, L., Stern, J., Szejko, N., Worbe, Y., & Martino, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy Hanover Medical School Hanover Germany
  • Institute of Systems Motor Science University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany
  • Division of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Bethesda Children's Hospital Budapest Hungary
  • University of Catania (IT)
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Pringsheim, Tamara
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-13
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
902-910
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W4313379902
Cited by
72
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Brain Foundation
  • Tourette Association of America
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Public Health Agency
  • Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Ministerstwo Zdrowia
  • Parkinsonfonden
  • Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
Keywords
clinical criteria, tic disorders, Tourette syndrome, diagnostic criteria, Delphi consensus, youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Tourette Syndrome, Humans, Prospective Studies, Tic Disorders, Tics, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review