Cited by 55Nursing Roles and PracticesEpilepsy research and treatmentNursing care and research

Efficacy of the epilepsy nurse: Results of a randomized controlled study

Pfäfflin, Margarete, Schmitz, Bettina, May, Theodor W.·2016·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Objective: We investigated the efficacy of epilepsy nurses on satisfaction with counseling about epilepsy in a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Methods: Patients with epilepsy treated by neurologists in outpatient clinics were consecutively enrolled and randomly allocated to either the epilepsy nurse (EN) group (n = 92) or the control group (n = 95). Patients in the EN group were advised according to their needs by epilepsy nurses. The control group received routine care without additional counseling. The EN group completed the questionnaires before the first consultation (T1) and 6 months later (T2); the control group completed the questionnaires twice with an interval of 6 months. Primary outcome measure was satisfaction of patients with information and support. Secondary outcome measures were satisfaction with patient–doctor relationship, organization of treatment, epilepsy knowledge, coping, and restrictions in daily life. Anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and global Quality of Life (item from QOLIE‐31) were also assessed. Statistical analysis included generalized estimating equation (GEE) and nonparametric tests. Results: Satisfaction with information and support improved significantly in the EN group compared to the control group (GEE, interaction group × time, p = 0.001). In addition, Epilepsy Knowledge (p = 0.014) and Coping (subscale Information Seeking) (p = 0.023) improved. Increase in satisfaction with counseling was dependent on patients' needs for information and on the amount of received information (Jonckheere‐Terpstra test, p < 0.001). No differences between the groups were observed on other epilepsy‐specific scales. Significance: A reliable questionnaire for satisfaction with epilepsy care has been developed. Epilepsy nurses improve the satisfaction of patients with counseling and information about epilepsy and concomitant problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.13424

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfäfflin, M., Schmitz, B., & May, T. W.
Affiliations
  • Gesellschaft für Epilepsieforschung e.V. (DE)
  • Vivantes Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Pfäfflin, Margarete
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-06
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
1190-1198
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2410723107
Cited by
55
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • UCB Pharma
  • Desitin
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
epilepsy, patient satisfaction, patient counseling, patient education, physician-patient relationship, coping, epilepsy knowledge, quality of life, anxiety, depression, outpatient care, information seeking
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depression, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review