The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: A consensus report from the International League Against Epilepsy Neuroimaging Task Force
Open accessAbstract
Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of fundamental importance to the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy, particularly when surgery is being considered. Despite previous recommendations and guidelines, practices for the use of MRI are variable worldwide and may not harness the full potential of recent technological advances for the benefit of people with epilepsy. The International League Against Epilepsy Diagnostic Methods Commission has thus charged the 2013‐2017 Neuroimaging Task Force to develop a set of recommendations addressing the following questions: (1) Who should have an MRI? (2) What are the minimum requirements for an MRI epilepsy protocol? (3) How should magnetic resonance (MR) images be evaluated? (4) How to optimize lesion detection? These recommendations target clinicians in established epilepsy centers and neurologists in general/district hospitals. They endorse routine structural imaging in new onset generalized and focal epilepsy alike and describe the range of situations when detailed assessment is indicated. The Neuroimaging Task Force identified a set of sequences, with three‐dimensional acquisitions at its core, the harmonized neuroimaging of epilepsy structural sequences—HARNESS‐MRI protocol. As these sequences are available on most MR scanners, the HARNESS‐MRI protocol is generalizable, regardless of the clinical setting and country. The Neuroimaging Task Force also endorses the use of computer‐aided image postprocessing methods to provide an objective account of an individual's brain anatomy and pathology. By discussing the breadth and depth of scope of MRI, this report emphasizes the unique role of this noninvasive investigation in the care of people with epilepsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scheffer, I. E., Berkovic, S., Capovilla, G., Connolly, M. B., French, J., Guilhoto, L., Hirsch, E., Jain, S., Mathern, G. W., Moshé, S. L., et al. (2017) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.13709 · Cited by 5,054
Kwan, P., Arzimanoglou, A., Berg, A. T., Brodie, M. J., Allen Hauser, W., Mathern, G., Moshé, S. L., Perucca, E., Wiebe, S., & French, J. (2010) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02397.x · Cited by 4,877
Berg, A. T., Berkovic, S. F., Brodie, M. J., Buchhalter, J., Cross, J. H., Van Emde Boas, W., Engel, J., French, J., Glauser, T. A., Mathern, G. W., et al. (2010) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02522.x · Cited by 4,363
Blümcke, I., Thom, M., Aronica, E., Armstrong, D. D., Vinters, H. V., Palmini, A., Jacques, T. S., Avanzini, G., Barkovich, A. J., Battaglia, G., et al. (2011) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02777.x · Cited by 1,743
Self-citationIs the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence?
Semah, F., Picot, M.-C., Adam, C., Broglin, D., Arzimanoglou, A., Bazin, B., Cavalcanti, D., & Baulac, M. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.5.1256 · Cited by 1,113
Blümcke, I., Thom, M., Aronica, E., Armstrong, D. D., Bartolomei, F., Bernasconi, A., Bernasconi, N., Bien, C. G., Cendes, F., Coras, R., et al. (2013) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12220 · Cited by 1,010
Self-citationHistopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy Surgery
Blumcke, I., Spreafico, R., Haaker, G., Coras, R., Kobow, K., Bien, C. G., Pfäfflin, M., Elger, C., Widman, G., Schramm, J., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1703784 · Cited by 931
Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Téllez-Zenteno, J. F., Ronquillo, L. H., Moien-Afshari, F., & Wiebe, S. (2010) · Epilepsy Research · doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.02.007 · Cited by 787
Review: Hippocampal sclerosis in epilepsy: a neuropathology review
Thom, M. (2014) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12150 · Cited by 563
Wilmshurst, J. M., Gaillard, W. D., Vinayan, K. P., Tsuchida, T. N., Plouin, P., Van Bogaert, P., Carrizosa, J., Elia, M., Craiu, D., Jovic, N. J., et al. (2015) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.13057 · Cited by 418
Cited by
Najm, I., Lal, D., Alonso Vanegas, M., Cendes, F., Lopes‐Cendes, I., Palmini, A., Paglioli, E., Sarnat, H. B., Walsh, C. A., Wiebe, S., et al. (2022) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.17301 · Cited by 361
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernasconi, A., Cendes, F., Theodore, W. H., Gill, R. S., Koepp, M. J., Hogan, R. E., Jackson, G. D., Federico, P., Labate, A., Vaudano, A. E., Blümcke, I., Ryvlin, P., & Bernasconi, N.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-28
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1054-1068
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2947216926
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 26.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: A consensus report from the International League Against Epilepsy Neuroimaging Task Force. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/epi.15612
- The paper
- Bernasconi, A., Cendes, F., Theodore, W. H., Gill, R. S., Koepp, M. J., Hogan, R. E., Jackson, G. D., Federico, P., Labate, A., Vaudano, A. E., Blümcke, I., Ryvlin, P., & Bernasconi, N. (2019). Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: A consensus report from the International League Against Epilepsy Neuroimaging Task Force. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.15612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
