Cited by 155EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Machine learning and wearable devices of the future

Open access
Beniczky, Sándor, Karoly, Philippa, Nurse, Ewan, Ryvlin, Philippe, Cook, Mark·2021·Epilepsia

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly recognized as a useful tool in healthcare applications, including epilepsy. One of the most important applications of ML in epilepsy is seizure detection and prediction, using wearable devices (WDs). However, not all currently available algorithms implemented in WDs are using ML. In this review, we summarize the state of the art of using WDs and ML in epilepsy, and we outline future development in these domains. There is published evidence for reliable detection of epileptic seizures using implanted electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes and wearable, non‐EEG devices. Application of ML using the data recorded with WDs from a large number of patients could change radically the way we diagnose and manage patients with epilepsy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.16555

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ambulatory seizure monitoring using wearables is now within reach.

    “Ambulatory seizure monitoring using wearables is now within reach1–7”

    From Data quality evaluation in wearable monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [2]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. An S, Malhotra K, Dilley C, et al. Predicting drug-resistant epilepsy -A machine learning approach based on administrative claims data. Epilepsy Behav 2018; 89:118-25.
  2. Beniczky, S., Karoly, P., Nurse, E., Ryvlin, P. & Cook, M. (2020). Machine learning and wearable devices of the future. EPILEPSIA, 62 (S2), pp.S116-S124. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16555. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/276056 File Description: Accepted

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beniczky, S., Karoly, P., Nurse, E., Ryvlin, P., & Cook, M.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Beniczky, Sándor
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-26
Volume
62
Issue
S2
Pages
S116-S124
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W3044588961
Cited by
155
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Epilepsy Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
epilepsy, seizure detection, seizure prediction, wearable devices, machine learning
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Electroencephalography, Forecasting, Humans, Seizures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review