The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sceptical optimist: challenges and perspectives for the application of environmental DNA in marine fisheries
Open accessAbstract
Application of environmental DNA (e DNA) analysis has attracted the attention of researchers, advisors and managers of living marine resources and biodiversity. The apparent simplicity and cost‐effectiveness of e DNA analysis make it highly attractive as species distributions can be revealed from water samples. Further, species‐specific analyses indicate that e DNA concentrations correlate with biomass and abundance, suggesting the possibility for quantitative applications estimating abundance and biomass of specific organisms in marine ecosystems, such as for stock assessment. However, the path from detecting occurrence of an organism to quantitative estimates is long and indirect, not least as e DNA concentration depends on several physical, chemical and biological factors which influence its production, persistence and transport in marine ecosystems. Here, we provide an overview of basic principles in relation to e DNA analysis with potential for marine fisheries application. We describe fundamental processes governing e DNA generation, breakdown and transport and summarize current uncertainties about these processes. We describe five major challenges in relation to application in fisheries assessment, where there is immediate need for knowledge building in marine systems, and point to apparent weaknesses of e DNA compared to established marine fisheries monitoring methods. We provide an overview of emerging applications of interest to fisheries management and point to recent technological advances, which could improve analysis efficiency. We advise precaution against exaggerating the present scope for application of e DNA analysis in fisheries monitoring, but also argue that with informed insights into strengths and limitations, e DNA analysis can become an integrated tool in fisheries assessment and management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies
Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D., & McCombie, W. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.49 · Cited by 4,352
Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate
Gillooly, J. F., Brown, J. H., West, G. B., Savage, V. M., & Charnov, E. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1061967 · Cited by 3,810
Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea
Beaugrand, G., Brander, K. M., Alistair Lindley, J., Souissi, S., & Reid, P. C. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02164 · Cited by 1,284
Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game
Leiberg, S., Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017798 · Cited by 442
Seasonal variation in environmental DNA in relation to population size and environmental factors
Buxton, A. S., Groombridge, J. J., Zakaria, N. B., & Griffiths, R. A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46294 · Cited by 203
Nagumo, K., Tanaka, M., Chuang, V. T. G., Setoyama, H., Watanabe, H., Yamada, N., Kubota, K., Tanaka, M., Matsushita, K., Yoshida, A., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085216 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Rourke, M. L., Fowler, A. M., Hughes, J. M., Broadhurst, M. K., DiBattista, J. D., Fielder, S., Wilkes Walburn, J., & Furlan, E. M. (2022) · Environmental DNA · doi:10.1002/edn3.185 · Cited by 435
Miya, M., Gotoh, R. O., & Sado, T. (2020) · Fisheries Science · doi:10.1007/s12562-020-01461-x · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, B. K., Bekkevold, D., Clausen, L. W., & Nielsen, E. E.
- Venue
- Fish and Fisheries
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 751-768
- ISSN
- 1467-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-2979
- OpenAlex
- W2797165674
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.