The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship risk factors for intimate partner violence among sexual and gender minorities: A multilevel analysis
Open accessAbstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is alarmingly prevalent among sexual and gender minority youth assigned female at birth (SGM‐AFAB), making it important to identify risk factors that can be targeted in prevention efforts for this population. Although several relationship‐level risk factors for IPV have been identified in different‐sex couples, research on SGM‐AFAB is sparse and predominantly cross‐sectional. The present study used seven waves of data from a longitudinal cohort study of SGM‐AFAB youth (n = 463) to explore relationship factors (relationship quality, destructive conflict, and self‐ and partner‐jealousy) as risk factors for perpetration and victimization of three types of IPV (physical, psychological, and coercive control). At each wave, participants reported on relationship factors and IPV for up to three romantic partners in the past 6 months. Multilevel models tested for associations between the relationship factors and IPV at three levels: between‐persons, within‐persons across time (wave), and within‐persons across relationships. Relationship quality was associated with IPV mostly at the between‐persons and within‐persons (wave) levels. Couple conflict was associated with all IPV outcomes at all levels. Partner jealousy was more consistently associated with IPV victimization; participant jealousy was more consistently linked with IPV perpetration. These novel findings suggest that, within SGM individuals, IPV may be influenced by relationship quality, destructive conflict, and jealousy as they fluctuate within individuals from relationship to relationship and within individuals over time. As such, these relationship factors represent promising potential targets for interventions to reduce IPV among SGM‐AFAB youth.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jealousy is one of the most robust correlates of psychological IPV perpetration, consistently linked to behaviors such as controlling, isolating, belittling, emotional withdrawal, and coercive intimidation.
“Jealousy is also one of the most robust correlates of psychological IPV perpetration, consistently linked to behaviors such as controlling, isolating, belittling, emotional withdrawal, and coercive intimidation (Brem, 2025; Keilholtz et al., 2023; Sarno et al., 2024; Velotti et al., 2018, 2020; Zurnacı & Toplu-Demirtaş, 2025).”
From Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Across Identities: Preliminary Psychometrics of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse-Short Form Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Samples in Türkiye (2026) · cites this paper as Sarno et al., 2024
Citations
Cites
Sardinha, L., Maheu-Giroux, M., Stöckl, H., Meyer, S. R., & García-Moreno, C. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02664-7 · Cited by 1,328
Balsam, K. F., & Szymanski, D. M. (2005) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00220.x · Cited by 427
A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships
Kimmes, J. G., Mallory, A. B., Spencer, C., Beck, A. R., Cafferky, B., & Stith, S. M. (2019) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838017708784 · Cited by 89
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1080/10522158.2011.616482 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022‐3514.80.5.754 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.03.003 · DOI
- Capaldi D. M., 2004, Duke series in child development and public policy, 223
- 10.1891/1946‐6560.3.2.231 · DOI · Paper page
- Capaldi D. M., 2005, Family psychology: The art of the science
- 10.1007/s10964‐013‐9975‐8 · DOI
- 10.1037/tra0001041 · DOI
- 10.1111/jmft.12552 · DOI
- 10.1037/vio0000275 · DOI
- 10.1177/0886260519846856 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0038656 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00026.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10896‐013‐9558‐1 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0012584 · DOI
- 10.2307/353683 · DOI
- 10.1111/jmft.12178 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jomf.12160 · DOI
- 10.1037/vio0000036 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10826‐017‐0734‐4 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022‐006x.61.1.70 · DOI
- 10.1177/104973150201200205 · DOI
- McKay T., 2020, Responding to intimate partner violence in relationship programs: Adult study summary. OPRE report 2020‐100
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.341 · DOI
- 10.1177/1524838015603551 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101924 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10461‐017‐1674‐0 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022‐006X.75.5.752 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/famp.12696 · DOI
- 10.1080/15332691.2011.562844 · DOI
- 10.1037/vio0000466 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.009 · DOI
- 10.1177/1524838020925776 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00659.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10896‐007‐9137‐4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.012 · DOI
- 10.1177/019251396017003001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1300/J137v08n02_10 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11121‐012‐0307‐0 · DOI
- 10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.25 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/019261899262023 · DOI
- Walters M. L., 2013, The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation
- Whitton S. W., 2018, The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, 297
- 10.1177/0886260516646093 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167214528988 · DOI
- 10.1037/fam0000337 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Demirtaş, E. T., & Zurnacı, B. (2026) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-026-03422-4
“…robust correlates of psychological IPV perpetration, consistently linked to behaviors such as controlling, isolating, belittling, emotional withdrawal, and coercive intimidation (Brem, 2025; Keilholtz et al., 2023; Sarno et al., 2024; Velotti et al., 2018, 2020; Zurnacı & Toplu-Demirtaş, 2025).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarno, E. L., Swann, G., Newcomb, M. E., & Whitton, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sarno, Elissa L.
- Venue
- Family Process
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-09-15
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 983-1000
- ISSN
- 0014-7370 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5300
- PMC
- PMC10940214
- OpenAlex
- W4386796171
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Family Process (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD086170)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, sexual and gender minorities, lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth, relationship quality, destructive conflict, jealousy, physical violence, psychological violence, coercive control, IPV perpetration, IPV victimization, romantic relationships
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Jealousy, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, Crime Victims, Multilevel Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review