CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Couples Therapy for Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Open access
Karakurt, Gunnur, Whiting, Kathleen, van Esch, Chantal, Bolen, Shari D., Calabrese, Joseph R.·2016·Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
DOI 10.1111/jmft.12178PMC PMC5050084
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Intimate partner violence is a serious public health problem accompanied by substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite its documented impact on health, there is no widely recognized treatment of choice. Some studies indicate that couples suffering from situational violence may benefit from couples therapy, but professionals are cautious to risk the possibility of violent retaliation between partners. After a comprehensive literature search of 1,733 citations, this systematic review and meta‐analysis compiles the results of six studies to investigate the effectiveness of couples therapy as a treatment for violence. Preliminary data suggest that couples therapy is a viable treatment in select situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jmft.12178

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dyadic treatment for IPV is successful in treating couples who experience situational violence.

    “Dyadic treatment for IPV has been found to be successful in treating couples who experience situational violence (Karakurt et al., 2016) but is contraindicated in relationships experiencing intimate partner terrorism or severe physical violence (Stith et al., 2011).”

    From The relationship between emotional intimate partner violence and other forms of violence: A metaanalytic review. (2024) · cites this paper as Karakurt et al., 2016

    The Discussion > Future Research (page unavailable) reports a moderate reduction in male-to-female situational violence following couples therapy. The Conclusions > Policy & Clinical Implications (page unavailable) limit the findings to mild-to-moderate situational violence and caution that benefits vary across couples. Thus, the source supports effectiveness in selected cases, but not the unqualified claim that dyadic treatment is successful for couples experiencing situational violence generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Archer J Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A metaanalytic review Psychological Bulletin 2000 126 651680 10989615
  2. Babcock JC Canady B Graham KH Schart L Hamel J Nicholls T The evolution of battering interventions: From the Dark Ages into the Scientific Age Family Therapy for Domestic Violence: A Practitioner’s Guide To Gender-Inclusive Research and Treatment 2007 NY Springer 215 244
  3. Baucom KJW Sevier M Eldridge KA Doss BD Christensen A Observed communication in couples 2 years after integrative and traditional behavioral couple therapy: Outcome and link with 5-year follow-up Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2011 79 5 565 576 21942502 PMC3339273
  4. Bograd M Family systems approaches to wife battering: A feminist critique American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1984 54 558 568 6507593
  5. Bradley R Friend D Gottman J Supporting healthy relationships in low-income, violent couples: Reducing conflict and strengthening relationship skills and satisfaction Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy 2011 10 97 116
  6. Bradley CB Gottman J Reducing Situational Violence in Low-Income Couples by Fostering Healthy Relationships Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy 2012 38 187 198 22765333
  7. Bradley R Drummey K Gottman J Gottman J Treating couples who mutually exhibit violence or aggression: Reducing behaviors that show a susceptibility for violence Journal of Family Violence 2014 29 549 558
  8. Campbell JC Health consequences of intimate partner violence Lancet 2002 359 1331 1336 11965295
  9. Christensen A Atkins DC Yi J Baucom DH George WH Couple and individual adjustment for 2 years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2006 74 6 1180 1191 17154747
  10. Clement U Schmidt G The outcome of couple therapy for sexual dysfunctions using three different formats Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 1983 9 67 78 6663640
  11. Cohen S O’Leary KD Foran H A randomized clinical trial of a brief, problem-focused couple therapy for depression Behavior Therapy 2010 41 4 433 446 21035609 PMC3536531
  12. Davidson GNS Horvath AO Three sessions of brief couples therapy: A clinical trial Journal of Family Psychology 1997 11 4 422 435
  13. Dekker J Everaerd W A long-term follow-up study of couples treated for sexual dysfunction Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 1983 9 99 112 6655706
  14. DerSimonian R Laird N Meta-analysis in clinical trials Controlled Clinical Trials 1986 7 3 177 188 3802833
  15. Egger M Smith GD Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ: British Medical Journal 1997 315 PMC2127453 9310563
  16. Fals-Stewart W Kashdan T O’farrell T Birchler G Behavioral couples therapy for drug-abusing patients: Effects on partner violence Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2002 22 87 96 11932134
  17. Fals-Stewart W Birchler G Kelley M Learning sobriety together: A randomized clinical trial examining behavioral couples therapy with alcoholic female patients Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2006 74 3 579 591 16822114
  18. Goldner V Penn P Sheinberg M Walker G Love and violence: Gender paradoxes in volatile attachments Family Process 1990 29 4 343 364 2286245
  19. GRADE Working Group Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations British Medical Journal 2004 328 1490 1494 15205295 PMC428525
  20. Johnson MP Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women Journal of Marriage and the Family 1995 57 283 294
  21. Higgins JPT Thompson SG Deeks JJ Altman DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis BMJ: British Medical Journal 2003 327 7414 557 560 12958120 PMC192859
  22. Jasinski JL Williams L Finkelhor D Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research 1998 Sage
  23. Johnson MP Leone JM The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women survey Journal of Family Issues 2005 26 322 349
  24. Karakurt G Smith D Whiting J Impact of intimate partner violence on women’s mental health Journal of Family Violence 2014 29 693 702 25313269 PMC4193378
  25. Karakurt G Anderson A Banford A Dial S Korkow H Rable F Doslovich S Strategies for managing difficult situations in between sessions American Journal of Family Therapy 2014 42 413 425 25294951 PMC4185211
  26. Lam W Fals-Stewart W Kelley M Effects of parent training with behavioral couples therapy for alcoholism PsycEXTRA Dataset 2009 14 3 19502478
  27. LaTaillade JJ Epstein N Werlinich C Conjoint Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence: A Cognitive Behavioral Approach Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2006 20 393 410
  28. Mankowski ES Haaken J Silvergleid CS Collateral Damage: An Analysis of the Achievements and Unintended Consequences of Batterer Intervention Programs and Discourse Journal of Family Violence 2002 17 2 167 184
  29. McCollum E Stith SM Conjoint couple’s treatment for intimate partner violence: Controversy and promise Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy 2007 6 71 82
  30. Monson CM Fredman SJ Macdonald A Pukay-Martin ND Resick PA Schnurr PP Effect of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for PTSD JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2012 308 7 700 709 22893167 PMC4404628
  31. Rosenthal R The “file drawer” problem and tolerance for null results Psychological Bulletin 1979 86 3 838 641
  32. Ruff S McComb JL Coker CJ Sprenkle DH Behavioral couples therapy for the treatment of substance abuse: A substantive and methodological review of O’Farrell, Fals-Stewart, and colleagues’ program of research Family Process 2010 49 439 456 21083548
  33. Saunders DG When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defence? Violence and Victims 1986 1 47 60 3154140
  34. Schlee KA Heyman RE O’Leary KD Group treatment for spouse abuse: Are women with PTSD appropriate participants? Journal of Family Violence 1998 13 1 1 20
  35. Stith SM McCollum EE Rosen KH Locke LD Kaslow F Multicouple group treatment for domestic violence Comprehensive textbook of psychotherapy 2002 4 New York John Wiley 499 520
  36. Stith S Rosen H McCollum E Thomsen C Treating intimate partner violence within intact couple relationships: Outcomes of multi-couple versus individual couple therapy Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2004 30 3 305 318 15293649
  37. Stith SM McCollum EE Rosen KH Locke L Goldberg P Lebow J Domestic violence focused couples treatment Handbook of Clinical Family Therapy 2005 New York John Wiley & Sons 406 430
  38. Straus MA Hamby SL BoneyMcCoy S Sugarman DB Revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data Journal of Family Issues 1996 17 3 283 316
  39. Tolman RM Edleson JL Stith SM Staus MA Intervention for men who batter: A review of research Understanding partner violence: Prevalence, causes, consequences, and solutions 1995 Minneapolis, MN National Council on Family Relations 262 272
  40. Whisman MA Dixon AE Johnson B Therapists’ perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy Journal of Family Psychology 1997 11 3 361 366
  41. Woodin E O’leary K Partner aggression severity as a risk marker for male and female violence recidivism Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 2006 32 3 283 296 16933434

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karakurt, G., Whiting, K., van Esch, C., Bolen, S. D., & Calabrese, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-05
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
567-583
ISSN
  • 0194-472X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0606
DOI
10.1111/jmft.12178
PMC
PMC5050084
OpenAlex
W2472676088
Cited by
158
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR000440)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
couple therapy, intimate partner violence, domestic violence treatment, treatment effectiveness
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Couples Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review