Cited by 76Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Oceanographic changes and exploitation drive the spatio‐temporal dynamics of A tlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus)

Open access
Fromentin, Jean‐Marc, Reygondeau, Gabriel, Bonhommeau, Sylvain, Beaugrand, Gregory·2014·Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract

Atlantic bluefin tuna (ABFT) has always displayed spectacular changes in its spatial distribution, but the underlying mechanism of such variations still remains obscure. This study focuses on this challenging issue by scrutinizing the intriguing ‘Brazilian episode’ during which a large quantity of ABFT (a temperate species) was caught during the 1960s in the equatorial Atlantic. To investigate this event, we applied a niche model to an extensive data set of catch and environmental variables from 1960 to 2009. ABFT exhibited a remarkably large ecological niche, which matches well with our current knowledge of ABFT. Our results also depicted a high probability of ABFT occurrence in the South Atlantic and, more interestingly, favorable environmental conditions in the western equatorial Atlantic during the 1960s, but not later. ABFT could thus have migrated from their northern spawning grounds to the South Atlantic during the 1960s through the western equatorial Atlantic, playing the role of an ‘ecological bridge’. We argue that the rarity of ABFT in the southern Atlantic during the last four decades would result from the interaction of several processes, particularly oceanographic conditions, migratory behavior, density‐dependence, exploitation levels and population structure. Examination of the catch data further indicated that the fish caught in the equatorial Atlantic were from the western stock and we concluded that the lack of rebuilding of this stock could result from a regime shift due to the combination of oceanographic changes in the equatorial Atlantic and overfishing in the North Atlantic in the 1960s and 1970s.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/fog.12050

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Atlantic bluefin, the model identifies the Mediterranean and northern Atlantic (>40oN) as most suitable, with habitat suitability increasing further north beyond the northern range of observations and decreasing towards the equator and southern hemisphere.

    “In the case of Atlantic bluefin, the model identifies the Mediterranean and the northern Atlantic (>40ºN) as most suitable, habitat suitability increasing further north beyond the northern range of the observations and decreasing towards the equator and southern hemisphere in spite of important catches that occurred in the past (Fromentin et al., 2014).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Fromentin et al., 2014

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Salinity can influence large-scale spatial distribution of tunas.

    “Salinity can influence large scale spatial distribution (e.g.Fromentin et al., 2014;Maury et al., 2001;Reygondeau et al., 2012).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Fromentin et al., 2014

  • Extensive longline datasets with broad spatio-temporal coverage have supported a number of studies on tuna distribution and habitat preferences.

    “In fact, extensive longline datasets with broad spatio-temporal coverage have supported a number of studies in relation to tuna distribution and habitat preferences (e.g.Fromentin et al., 2014;Reygondeau et al., 2012;Worm and Tittensor, 2011).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Fromentin et al., 2014

  • Atlantic bluefin tuna can also tolerate a wide range of biotic environments in terms of plankton concentrations.

    “our findings tend to confirm that Atlantic bluefin can also tolerate a wide range of biotic environments (in terms of plankton concentrations).”

    From Global habitat preferences of commercially valuable tuna (2015) · cites this paper as Fromentin et al., 2014

    The Results and Discussion describe a wide *abiotic* niche for Atlantic bluefin tuna, based on temperature, salinity and depth. The Data section says chlorophyll concentration could not be included in the niche model, so our copy does not establish tolerance across a wide range of plankton concentrations. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Graham, J.B. and Dickson, K.A. (2001) Anatomical and physiological specializations for endothermy. In: Tuna. Physiology, ecology, and evolution. B.A. Block and E.D. Stevens (eds) San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 121-165.
  2. Hutchinson, G.E. (1957). A treatise on limnology, vol. 1. Geography, Physics and Chemistry. New- York: Wiley. 1015pp.
  3. ICCAT (2012) Statistical Bulletin. Madrid, International Commission for the Conservation of the Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). 156 pp.
  4. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936) On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci India, 2: 49-55.
  5. Mielke, P.W., Berry, K.J. & Brier, G.W. (1981) Application of multiresponse permutation procedures for examining seasonal changes in monthly mean sea-level pressure patterns. Monthly Weather Review 109: 120-126.
  6. Worm, B. and Tittensor, D.P. (2011) Range contraction in large pelagic predators. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108: 11942-11947.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fromentin, J., Reygondeau, G., Bonhommeau, S., & Beaugrand, G.
Affiliations
  • Ifremer (FR)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
  • CNRS (Centre national de recherche scientifique) UMR 8187 LOG 28 avenue Foch BP 80 Wimereux 62930 France
Corresponding author
Fromentin, Jean‐Marc
Venue
Fisheries Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-16
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
147-156
ISSN
  • 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2419
OpenAlex
W2048901620
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
Thunnus thynnus, spatiotemporal variation, ecological niche, niche models, oceanographic change, fish migration, tipping points, overfishing, fisheries exploitation, density dependence, population structure (demography), western equatorial Atlantic, spawning grounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review