Does COMT genotype influence the effects of d‐amphetamine on executive functioning?
Open accessAbstract
In a widely cited study, Mattay et al. reported that amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg oral, or 17 mg for a 68 kg individual) impaired behavioral and brain indices of executive functioning, measured using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) and N‐Back working memory task, in 6 individuals homozygous for the met allele of the val158met polymorphism in the catechol‐O‐methyltransferase (COMT) gene, whereas it improved executive functioning in 10 individuals homozygous for the more active val allele. We attempted to replicate their behavioral findings in a larger sample, using similar executive functioning tasks and a broader range of amphetamine doses. Over four sessions, n = 200 healthy normal adults received oral placebo, d‐amphetamine 5, 10, and 20 mg (average of 0.07, 0.15 and 0.29 mg/kg), under counterbalanced double‐blind conditions and completed WCST and N‐back tests of executive functioning. Amphetamine had typical effects on blood pressure and processing speed but did not affect executive functioning. COMT genotype (val158met) was not related to executive functioning under placebo or amphetamine conditions, even when we compared only the homozygous val/val and met/met genotypes at the highest dose of amphetamine (20 mg). Thus, we were not able to replicate the behavioral interaction between COMT and amphetamine seen in Mattay et al. We discuss possible differences between the studies and the implications of our findings for the use of COMT genotyping to predict clinical responses to dopaminergic drugs, and the use of intermediate phenotypes in genetic research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wardle et al. (2013) reported that amphetamine (5, 10 and 20 mg) enhances executive function in a dose-dependent manner in 177 participants.
“Wardle et al. (2013) reported that AMP (5, 10 and 20 mg) enhances executive function in dose‐dependent manner in 177 participants.”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Wardle et al., 2013
The study used 5, 10 and 20 mg doses, and the Methods (Measures; page unavailable) give n = 177 for the b-WCST analysis. But the Results (Typical amphetamine effects; page unavailable) report dose-dependent improvement in processing speed, not executive functioning; the Abstract explicitly says amphetamine did not affect executive functioning. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSome studies did not find COMT-dependent differences in executive or WM function after dexamphetamine administration.
“some studies did not find COMT‐dependent differences in executive or WM function after dexamphetamine (e.g., 5, 10 or 20 mg) administration”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Wardle et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Neuropsychopharmacology of Fronto-Executive Function: Monoaminergic Modulation
Robbins, T. W., & Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135535 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Mattay, V. S., Goldberg, T. E., Fera, F., Hariri, A. R., Tessitore, A., Egan, M. F., Kolachana, B., Callicott, J. H., & Weinberger, D. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0931309100 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Barnett, J. H., Scoriels, L., & Munafò, M. R. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.01.005 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Differential subjective effects of D-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase
White, T. L., Justice, A. J. H., & de Wit, H. (2002) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00818-3 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Barch DM 2004 Pharmacological manipulation of human working memory Psychopharmacology (Berl) 174 126 135 15205883
- Chen J Lipska BK Halim N Ma QD Matsumoto M Melhem S Kolachana BS Hyde TM Herman MM Apud J 2004 Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): Effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain Am J Hum Genet 75 807 821 15457404 PMC1182110
- Egan MF Goldberg TE Kolachana BS Callicott JH Mazzanti CM Straub RE Goldman D Weinberger DR 2001 Effect of COMT Val108/158Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 6917 PMC34453 11381111
- Goldberg TE Egan MF Gscheidle T Coppola R Weickert T Kolachana B Goldman D Weinberger DR 2003 Executive subprocesses in working memory: Relationship to catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and schizophrenia Arch Gen Psychiatry 60 889 896 12963670
- Goldman D Ducci F 2007 Deconstruction of vulnerability to complex diseases: enhanced effect sizes and power of intermediate phenotypes ScientificWorldJournal 7 124 130 17982585 PMC5901150
- Goldman D Weinberger DR Malhotra AK Goldberg TE 2009 The role of COMT Val158Met in cognition Biol Psychiatry 65 e1 e2 18838132 PMC2679368
- Hamidovic A Dlugos A Palmer AA de Wit H 2010 Catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype modulates sustained attention in both the drug-free state and in response to amphetamine Psychiatr Genet 20 85 92 20414144 PMC2875066
- Hart AB de Wit H Palmer AA (in press) Candidate gene studies of a promising intermediate phenotype: Failure to replicate Neuropsychopharmacology PMC3671998 23303064
- Hart AB Engelhardt BE Wardle MC Sokoloff G Stephens M de Wit H Palmer AA 2012 Genome-wide association study of d-amphetamine response in healthy volunteers identifies putative associations, including cadherin 13 (CDH13) PLoS ONE 7 e42646 22952603 PMC3429486
- Joy S Kaplan E Fein D 2004 Speed and memory in the WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding subtest across the adult lifespan Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19 759 767 15288329
- Judd CM McClelland GH Ryan CS 2009 Data analysis: A model comparison approach 2 Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group New York, NY, US
- Mattay VS Goldberg TE Fera F Hariri AR Tessitore A Egan MF Kolachana B Callicott JH Weinberger DR 2003 Catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 6186 6191 PMC156347 12716966
- Papaleo F Crawley JN Song J Lipska BK Pickel J Weinberger DR Chen J 2008 Genetic dissection of the role of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase in cognition and stress reactivity in mice The Journal of Neuroscience 28 8709 8723 18753372 PMC2561993
- Patterson N Price AL Reich D 2006 Population structure and eigenanalysis PLoS genetics 2 e190 17194218 PMC1713260
- Piper B Li V Eiwaz M Kobel Y Benice T Chu A Olsen R Rice D Gray H Mueller S 2012 Executive function on the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests Behavior Research Methods 44 110 123 21534005 PMC3705215
- Silber BY Croft RJ Papafotiou K Stough C 2006 The acute effects of d-amphetamine and methamphetamine on attention and psychomotor performance Psychopharmacology (Berl) 187 154 169 16761129
- Smith ME Farah MJ 2011 Are prescription stimulants “smart pills”? The epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience of prescription stimulant use by normal healthy individuals Psychol Bull 137 717 741 21859174 PMC3591814
- Wardle MC de Wit H Penton-Voak IS Lewis G Munafò MR (under review) Lack of association between COMT and working memory in a population-based cohort of healthy young adults PMC3656369 23337869
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kassim, F. M. (2023) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.2856 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“T A B L E 1 Results for the main effect of dexamphetamine on working memory scores during verbal (VWM) and spatial (SWM) WM tasks after treatments with oral doses of drug or placebo Working memory Study Task Dose N Age (M ± SD) Main effect Interaction (drug X time) SWW Mattay et al., 2003 n‐back 0.25 mg/kg 27 34 � 2.2…”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Wardle, M. C., Hart, A. B., Palmer, A. A., & de Wit, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Genes, Brain and Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-29
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-20
- ISSN
- 1601-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1601-1848
- PMC
- PMC3553317
- OpenAlex
- W2117844119
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Genes Brain & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA02812, R01DA032015, R21DA024845, R01DA021336, R01DA002812, T32DA007255)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- COMT gene, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, d-amphetamine, executive function, replication failure, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, dopaminergic therapy, endophenotypes, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Blood Pressure, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Dextroamphetamine, Female, Genotype, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Case-Control Studies, Mutation, Missense, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review