Cited by 29Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismSchizophrenia research and treatment

Does COMT genotype influence the effects of d‐amphetamine on executive functioning?

Open access
Wardle, M. C., Hart, A. B., Palmer, A. A., de Wit, H.·2013·Genes, Brain and Behavior

Abstract

In a widely cited study, Mattay et al. reported that amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg oral, or 17 mg for a 68 kg individual) impaired behavioral and brain indices of executive functioning, measured using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) and N‐Back working memory task, in 6 individuals homozygous for the met allele of the val158met polymorphism in the catechol‐O‐methyltransferase (COMT) gene, whereas it improved executive functioning in 10 individuals homozygous for the more active val allele. We attempted to replicate their behavioral findings in a larger sample, using similar executive functioning tasks and a broader range of amphetamine doses. Over four sessions, n = 200 healthy normal adults received oral placebo, d‐amphetamine 5, 10, and 20 mg (average of 0.07, 0.15 and 0.29 mg/kg), under counterbalanced double‐blind conditions and completed WCST and N‐back tests of executive functioning. Amphetamine had typical effects on blood pressure and processing speed but did not affect executive functioning. COMT genotype (val158met) was not related to executive functioning under placebo or amphetamine conditions, even when we compared only the homozygous val/val and met/met genotypes at the highest dose of amphetamine (20 mg). Thus, we were not able to replicate the behavioral interaction between COMT and amphetamine seen in Mattay et al. We discuss possible differences between the studies and the implications of our findings for the use of COMT genotyping to predict clinical responses to dopaminergic drugs, and the use of intermediate phenotypes in genetic research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gbb.12012

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Barch DM 2004 Pharmacological manipulation of human working memory Psychopharmacology (Berl) 174 126 135 15205883
  2. Chen J Lipska BK Halim N Ma QD Matsumoto M Melhem S Kolachana BS Hyde TM Herman MM Apud J 2004 Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): Effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain Am J Hum Genet 75 807 821 15457404 PMC1182110
  3. Egan MF Goldberg TE Kolachana BS Callicott JH Mazzanti CM Straub RE Goldman D Weinberger DR 2001 Effect of COMT Val108/158Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 6917 PMC34453 11381111
  4. Goldberg TE Egan MF Gscheidle T Coppola R Weickert T Kolachana B Goldman D Weinberger DR 2003 Executive subprocesses in working memory: Relationship to catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and schizophrenia Arch Gen Psychiatry 60 889 896 12963670
  5. Goldman D Ducci F 2007 Deconstruction of vulnerability to complex diseases: enhanced effect sizes and power of intermediate phenotypes ScientificWorldJournal 7 124 130 17982585 PMC5901150
  6. Goldman D Weinberger DR Malhotra AK Goldberg TE 2009 The role of COMT Val158Met in cognition Biol Psychiatry 65 e1 e2 18838132 PMC2679368
  7. Hamidovic A Dlugos A Palmer AA de Wit H 2010 Catechol-O-methyltransferase val158met genotype modulates sustained attention in both the drug-free state and in response to amphetamine Psychiatr Genet 20 85 92 20414144 PMC2875066
  8. Hart AB de Wit H Palmer AA (in press) Candidate gene studies of a promising intermediate phenotype: Failure to replicate Neuropsychopharmacology PMC3671998 23303064
  9. Hart AB Engelhardt BE Wardle MC Sokoloff G Stephens M de Wit H Palmer AA 2012 Genome-wide association study of d-amphetamine response in healthy volunteers identifies putative associations, including cadherin 13 (CDH13) PLoS ONE 7 e42646 22952603 PMC3429486
  10. Joy S Kaplan E Fein D 2004 Speed and memory in the WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding subtest across the adult lifespan Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19 759 767 15288329
  11. Judd CM McClelland GH Ryan CS 2009 Data analysis: A model comparison approach 2 Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group New York, NY, US
  12. Mattay VS Goldberg TE Fera F Hariri AR Tessitore A Egan MF Kolachana B Callicott JH Weinberger DR 2003 Catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 6186 6191 PMC156347 12716966
  13. Papaleo F Crawley JN Song J Lipska BK Pickel J Weinberger DR Chen J 2008 Genetic dissection of the role of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase in cognition and stress reactivity in mice The Journal of Neuroscience 28 8709 8723 18753372 PMC2561993
  14. Patterson N Price AL Reich D 2006 Population structure and eigenanalysis PLoS genetics 2 e190 17194218 PMC1713260
  15. Piper B Li V Eiwaz M Kobel Y Benice T Chu A Olsen R Rice D Gray H Mueller S 2012 Executive function on the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests Behavior Research Methods 44 110 123 21534005 PMC3705215
  16. Silber BY Croft RJ Papafotiou K Stough C 2006 The acute effects of d-amphetamine and methamphetamine on attention and psychomotor performance Psychopharmacology (Berl) 187 154 169 16761129
  17. Smith ME Farah MJ 2011 Are prescription stimulants “smart pills”? The epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience of prescription stimulant use by normal healthy individuals Psychol Bull 137 717 741 21859174 PMC3591814
  18. Wardle MC de Wit H Penton-Voak IS Lewis G Munafò MR (under review) Lack of association between COMT and working memory in a population-based cohort of healthy young adults PMC3656369 23337869

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wardle, M. C., Hart, A. B., Palmer, A. A., & de Wit, H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-29
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
ISSN
  • 1601-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-1848
OpenAlex
W2117844119
Cited by
29
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes Brain & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA02812, R01DA032015, R21DA024845, R01DA021336, R01DA002812, T32DA007255)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
COMT gene, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, d-amphetamine, executive function, replication failure, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, dopaminergic therapy, endophenotypes, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Blood Pressure, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Dextroamphetamine, Female, Genotype, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Case-Control Studies, Mutation, Missense, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review