Cited by 957Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The Neuropsychopharmacology of Fronto-Executive Function: Monoaminergic Modulation

Open access
Robbins, T.W., Arnsten, A.F.T.·2009·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

We review the modulatory effects of the catecholamine neurotransmitters noradrenaline and dopamine on prefrontal cortical function. The effects of pharmacologic manipulations of these systems, sometimes in comparison with the indoleamine serotonin (5-HT), on performance on a variety of tasks that tap working memory, attentional-set formation and shifting, reversal learning, and response inhibition are compared in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans using, in a behavioral context, several techniques ranging from microiontophoresis and single-cell electrophysiological recording to pharmacologic functional magnetic resonance imaging. Dissociable effects of drugs and neurotoxins affecting these monoamine systems suggest new ways of conceptualizing state-dependent fronto-executive functions, with implications for understanding the molecular genetic basis of mental illness and its treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135535

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dopamine modulates motivation and reinforcement learning.

    “Dopamine modulates motivation and reinforcement learning; norepinephrine regulates arousal and vigilance; serotonin contributes to impulse control and mood stabilization; acetylcholine enhances attention and memory encoding (Robbins and Arnsten, 2009).”

    From Enhancement of modern defense capabilities by convergence of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Robbins and Arnsten, 2009

    The section “Catecholamines Are Released in PFC According to Arousal State” links dopamine activity to appetitive stimuli, learning, and reward-related choice. The Introduction mentions motivation as a possible influence on prefrontal arousal, but does not specifically assign motivation to dopamine; the paper’s discussion also does not establish the broader claim that dopamine modulates reinforcement learning. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neurobiological mechanisms and neurotransmitter systems, including dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, acetylcholine, the HPA axis, and neural oscillations, provide substrates for adaptability and resilience.

    “Neurobiological mechanisms and neurotransmitter systems ranging from neurotransmitter regulation, like, dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and acetylcholine to stress physiology related to hypothalamic-pituarity-adrenal axis or HPA axis and neural oscillations—provide the substrates for adaptability and resilience (Buzsáki, 2006; McEwen, 2007; Robbins and Arnsten, 2009).”

    From Enhancement of modern defense capabilities by convergence of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Robbins and Arnsten, 2009

    The Introduction describes neurotransmitter systems, including serotonin and acetylcholine, as modulating forebrain processing in ways related to arousal and stress; the section on catecholamines and cognitive flexibility also connects norepinephrine signaling with attention and responses to new contingencies. These passages support the neurotransmitter-regulation part of the sentence, but the paper does not establish the HPA axis or neural oscillations as substrates for adaptability and resilience. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Serotonin contributes to impulse control and mood stabilization.

    “Dopamine modulates motivation and reinforcement learning; norepinephrine regulates arousal and vigilance; serotonin contributes to impulse control and mood stabilization; acetylcholine enhances attention and memory encoding (Robbins and Arnsten, 2009).”

    From Enhancement of modern defense capabilities by convergence of cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Robbins and Arnsten, 2009

    The section “Role of Monoamines in Human Fronto-Executive Processing” reports that reducing central serotonin altered prefrontal activity during a go/no-go task, supporting a role in inhibitory control. The copy does not establish that serotonin stabilizes mood; its discussion of treatments for bipolar disorder in the “DGKH” section concerns protein kinase C signaling instead. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Norepinephrine regulates arousal and vigilance.

    “Dopamine modulates motivation and reinforcement learning; norepinephrine regulates arousal and vigilance; serotonin contributes to impulse control and mood stabilization; acetylcholine enhances attention and memory encoding (Robbins and Arnsten, 2009).”
  • Optimal levels of dopamine in PFC are essential for WM performance.

    “In general, optimal levels of dopamine in PFC are essential for WM performance”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Baddeley AD 1986 Working memory Oxford, UK Oxford Univ. Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robbins, T. W., & Arnsten, A. F. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
267-287
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2160985876
Cited by
957
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 72
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (RL1AA017536)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG006036, P01AG030004, R01AG006036, AG06036)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH068789)
  • National Center for Research Resources (U54RR024350)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, prefrontal cortex, working memory, set-shifting, reversal learning, response inhibition, neuropsychopharmacology, neurotoxins, mental illness
MeSH terms
Animals, Catecholamines, Cognition, Humans, Mental Processes, Synaptic Transmission, Neuropharmacology, Psychomotor Performance, Serotonin, Prefrontal Cortex, Neurocognitive Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review