Cited by 131Marine and fisheries researchClimate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

Increasing variance in North Pacific climate relates to unprecedented ecosystem variability off California

Sydeman, William J., Santora, Jarrod A., Thompson, Sarah Ann, Marinovic, Baldo, Lorenzo, Emanuele Di·2013·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Changes in variance are infrequently examined in climate change ecology. We tested the hypothesis that recent high variability in demographic attributes of salmon and seabirds off California is related to increasing variability in remote, large-scale forcing in the North Pacific operating through changes in local food webs. Linear, indirect numerical responses between krill (primarily Thysanoessa spinifera) and juvenile rockfish abundance (catch per unit effort (CPUE)) explained >80% of the recent variability in the demography of these pelagic predators. We found no relationships between krill and regional upwelling, though a strong connection to the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation (NPGO) index was established. Variance in NPGO and related central Pacific warming index increased after 1985, whereas variance in the canonical ENSO and Pacific Decadal Oscillation did not change. Anthropogenic global warming or natural climate variability may explain recent intensification of the NPGO and its increasing ecological significance. Assessing non-stationarity in atmospheric-environmental interactions and placing greater emphasis on documenting changes in variance of bio-physical systems will enable insight into complex climate-marine ecosystem dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.12165

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The scale of future responses to anthropogenic climate change may be beyond the historical scales of variability.

    “However, the scale of future responses to anthropogenic climate change may be beyond the historical scales of variability [106]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sydeman, W. J., Santora, J. A., Thompson, S. A., Marinovic, B., & Lorenzo, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Farallon Institute (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Sydeman, William J.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-25
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1662-1675
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2119849769
Cited by
131
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • Resources Legacy Fund
  • California Sea Grant, University of California, San Diego
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
  • NOAA Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Keywords
North Pacific Gyre Oscillation, climate variability, seabird demography, rockfish, Thysanoessa spinifera, krill, food web dynamics, ENSO, Pacific Decadal Oscillation, upwelling, non-stationarity, California coast
MeSH terms
Animals, California, Pacific Ocean, Ecosystem, Food Chain, Biodiversity, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review