The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review and meta‐analysis of the effects of multiple abiotic stressors on marine embryos and larvae
Abstract
Marine organisms are simultaneously exposed to anthropogenic stressors with likely interactive effects, including synergisms in which the combined effects of multiple stressors are greater than the sum of individual effects. Early life stages of marine organisms are potentially vulnerable to the stressors associated with global change, but identifying general patterns across studies, species and response variables is challenging. This review represents the first meta‐analysis of multistressor studies to target early marine life stages (embryo to larvae), particularly between temperature, salinity and pH as these are the best studied. Knowledge gaps in research on multiple abiotic stressors and early life stages are also identified. The meta‐analysis yielded several key results: (1) Synergistic interactions (65% of individual tests) are more common than additive (17%) or antagonistic (17%) interactions. (2) Larvae are generally more vulnerable than embryos to thermal and pH stress. (3) Survival is more likely than sublethal responses to be affected by thermal, salinity and pH stress. (4) Interaction types vary among stressors, ontogenetic stages and biological responses, but they are more consistent among phyla. (5) Ocean acidification is a greater stressor for calcifying than noncalcifying larvae. Despite being more ecologically realistic than single‐factor studies, multifactorial studies may still oversimplify complex systems, and so meta‐analyses of the data from them must be cautiously interpreted with regard to extrapolation to field conditions. Nonetheless, our results identify taxa with early life stages that may be particularly vulnerable (e.g. molluscs, echinoderms) or robust (e.g. arthropods, cnidarians) to abiotic stress. We provide a list of recommendations for future multiple stressor studies, particularly those focussed on early marine life stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kroeker, K. J., Kordas, R. L., Crim, R., Hendriks, I. E., Ramajo, L., Singh, G. S., Duarte, C. M., & Gattuso, J. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12179 · Cited by 2,298
Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms
Kroeker, K. J., Kordas, R. L., Crim, R. N., & Singh, G. G. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01518.x · Cited by 1,621
Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals
Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E., & Dulvy, N. K. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1539 · Cited by 1,585
Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution
(2013) · doi:10.1515/9781400846184 · Cited by 1,183
Losers and winners in coral reefs acclimatized to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations
Fabricius, K. E., Langdon, C., Uthicke, S., Humphrey, C., Noonan, S., De’ath, G., Okazaki, R., Muehllehner, N., Glas, M. S., & Lough, J. M. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1122 · Cited by 1,006
Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies
Darling, E. S., & Côté, I. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01243.x · Cited by 723
Thomsen, J., Casties, I., Pansch, C., Körtzinger, A., & Melzner, F. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12109 · Cited by 446
Byrne, M., & Przeslawski, R. (2013) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/ict049 · Cited by 388
Self-citationAndersson, A., Mackenzie, F., & Bates, N. (2008) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps07639 · Cited by 375
Effects of ocean acidification on invertebrate settlement at volcanic CO2 vents
Cigliano, M., Gambi, M. C., Rodolfo-Metalpa, R., Patti, F. P., & Hall-Spencer, J. M. (2010) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-010-1513-6 · Cited by 195
Cited by
Net effects of multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems: a meta‐analysis
Jackson, M. C., Loewen, C. J. G., Vinebrooke, R. D., & Chimimba, C. T. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13028 · Cited by 854
The Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Ecosystems and Reliant Human Communities
Doney, S. C., Busch, D. S., Cooley, S. R., & Kroeker, K. J. (2020) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083019 · Cited by 678
Gunderson, A. R., Armstrong, E. J., & Stillman, J. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033953 · Cited by 666
Orr, J. A., Vinebrooke, R. D., Jackson, M. C., Kroeker, K. J., Kordas, R. L., Mantyka-Pringle, C., Van den Brink, P. J., De Laender, F., Stoks, R., Holmstrup, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.0421 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Przeslawski, R., Byrne, M., & Mellin, C.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2122-2140
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2150415139
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 20.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review and meta‐analysis of the effects of multiple abiotic stressors on marine embryos and larvae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.12833
- The paper
- Przeslawski, R., Byrne, M., & Mellin, C. (2015). A review and meta‐analysis of the effects of multiple abiotic stressors on marine embryos and larvae. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.