Effects of experimental fuel additions on fire intensity and severity: unexpected carbon resilience of a neotropical forest
Abstract
Global changes and associated droughts, heat waves, logging activities, and forest fragmentation may intensify fires in Amazonia by altering forest microclimate and fuel dynamics. To isolate the effects of fuel loads on fire behavior and fire-induced changes in forest carbon cycling, we manipulated fine fuel loads in a fire experiment located in southeast Amazonia. We predicted that a 50% increase in fine fuel loads would disproportionally increase fire intensity and severity (i.e., tree mortality and losses in carbon stocks) due to multiplicative effects of fine fuel loads on the rate of fire spread, fuel consumption, and burned area. The experiment followed a fully replicated randomized block design (N = 6) comprised of unburned control plots and burned plots that were treated with and without fine fuel additions. The fuel addition treatment significantly increased burned area (+22%) and consequently canopy openness (+10%), fine fuel combustion (+5%), and mortality of individuals ≥5 cm in diameter at breast height (dbh; +37%). Surprisingly, we observed nonsignificant effects of the fuel addition treatment on fireline intensity, and no significant differences among the three treatments for (i) mortality of large trees (≥30 cm dbh), (ii) aboveground forest carbon stocks, and (iii) soil respiration. It was also surprising that postfire tree growth and wood increment were higher in the burned plots treated with fuels than in the unburned control. These results suggest that (i) fine fuel load accumulation increases the likelihood of larger understory fires and (ii) single, low-intensity fires weakly influence carbon cycling of this primary neotropical forest, although delayed postfire mortality of large trees may lower carbon stocks over the long term. Overall, our findings indicate that increased fine fuel loads alone are unlikely to create threshold conditions for high-intensity, catastrophic fires during nondrought years.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fire can alter soil in ways that influence vegetation recovery, the structure of invertebrate and microbial communities, and availability of nutrients.
“Dependent on the duration, magnitude and depth of heat transfer, fire can alter soil in ways that influence vegetation recovery (Brando, Oliveria-Santos, Rocha, Cury, & Coe, 2016;Johnstone, Hollingsworth, Chapin, & Mack, 2010), the structure of invertebrate and microbial communities (Hewitt et al., 2016) and availability of nutrients (Karam, Weisberg, Scheller, Johnson, & Miller, 2013).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Brando et al., 2016
Cites
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013
Jolly, W. M., Cochrane, M. A., Freeborn, P. H., Holden, Z. A., Brown, T. J., Williamson, G. J., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8537 · Cited by 2,200 · see citing works
Cochrane, M. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01437 · Cited by 1,218 · see citing works
Nepstad, D. C., Stickler, C. M., Filho, B. S., & Merry, F. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0036 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Brando, P. M., Oliveria‐Santos, C., Rocha, W., Cury, R., & Coe, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
- Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
- Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Brando, Paulo M.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2516-2525
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2223282772
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- National Science Foundation (1146206)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- fine fuel load, fire intensity, fire severity, carbon stocks, tree mortality, soil respiration, canopy openness, fireline intensity, burned area, Neotropical forests
- MeSH terms
- Carbon, Fires, Soil, South America, Trees, Tropical Climate, Carbon Cycle, Forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review