Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 744

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity

Croft, Holly, Chen, Jing M., Luo, Xiangzhong, Bartlett, Paul, Chen, Bin, Staebler, Ralf M.·2017·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Improving the accuracy of estimates of forest carbon exchange is a central priority for understanding ecosystem response to increased atmospheric CO2 levels and improving carbon cycle modelling. However, the spatially continuous parameterization of photosynthetic capacity (Vcmax) at global scales and appropriate temporal intervals within terrestrial biosphere models (TBM s) remains unresolved. This research investigates the use of biochemical parameters for modelling leaf photosynthetic capacity within a deciduous forest. Particular attention is given to the impacts of seasonality on both leaf biophysical variables and physiological processes, and their interdependent relationships. Four deciduous tree species were sampled across three growing seasons (2013–2015), approximately every 10 days for leaf chlorophyll content (Chl Leaf) and canopy structure. Leaf nitrogen (N Area) was also measured during 2014. Leaf photosynthesis was measured during 2014–2015 using a Li‐6400 gas‐exchange system, with A‐Ci curves to model Vcmax. Results showed that seasonality and variations between species resulted in weak relationships between Vcmax normalized to 25°C () and N Area (R2 = 0.62, P < 0.001), whereas Chl Leaf demonstrated a much stronger correlation with (R2 = 0.78, P < 0.001). The relationship between Chl Leaf and N Area was also weak (R2 = 0.47, P < 0.001), possibly due to the dynamic partitioning of nitrogen, between and within photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic fractions. The spatial and temporal variability of was mapped using Landsat TM/ETM satellite data across the forest site, using physical models to derive Chl Leaf. TBM s largely treat photosynthetic parameters as either fixed constants or varying according to leaf nitrogen content. This research challenges assumptions that simple N Area– relationships can reliably be used to constrain photosynthetic capacity in TBM s, even within the same plant functional type. It is suggested that Chl Leaf provides a more accurate, direct proxy for and is also more easily retrievable from satellite data. These results have important implications for carbon modelling within deciduous ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.13599

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 744

Metadata

Authors
Croft, H., Chen, J. M., Luo, X., Bartlett, P., Chen, B., & Staebler, R. M.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-21
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
3513-3524
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2565157507
Cited by
744
References
4
FWCI
18.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.13599
The paper
Croft, H., Chen, J. M., Luo, X., Bartlett, P., Chen, B., & Staebler, R. M. (2017). Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13599

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.