The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors Influencing Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Natural Forests at the Biome Scale
Open accessAbstract
Chlorophyll (Chl) is an important photosynthetic pigment to the plant, largely determining photosynthetic capacity and hence plant growth. However, this concept has not been verified in natural forests, especially at a large scale. Furthermore, how Chl varies in natural forests remains unclear. In this study, the leaves of 823 plant species were collected from nine typical forest communities, extending from cold-temperate to tropical zones in China, to determine the main factors influencing leaf chlorophyll content in different regions and at different scales. We measured chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), Chl (Chl a+ Chl b), and the ratio of Chl a and Chl b (Chl a/b). The results showed that Chl a, Chl b, and Chl a/b values were in the range of 0.87–15.92 mg g–1 (mean: 4.18 mg g–1), 0.32–6.42 mg g–1 (mean 1.72 mg g–1), and 1.43–7.07 (mean: 2.47). The values of these three Chl parameters significantly differed among plant functional groups (trees < shrubs < herbs, coniferous trees < broadleaved trees, and evergreens < deciduous trees). Unexpectedly, Chl a, Chl b, and Chl a+b increased slightly with increasing latitude. Climate, soil, and phylogeny exert only a small effect on the spatial variation of Chl in natural forests, with large variation in the Chl of coexisting species masking the spatial patterns. This study is the first to report variations in Chl among different types of natural forests at a large scale, demonstrating that the fuzzy regulation of Chl makes it very difficult to take Chl as the main input parameter to the models of natural forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · Cited by 4,678
Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo
Baker, N. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759 · Cited by 4,639
ABSORPTION OF LIGHT BY CHLOROPHYLL SOLUTIONS
Mackinney, G. (1941) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)51320-x · Cited by 3,998
PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra
Jacquemoud, S., & Baret, F. (1990) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(90)90100-z · Cited by 2,400
Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., & Kembel, S. W. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn358 · Cited by 1,821
Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree
Wikström, N., Savolainen, V., & Chase, M. W. (2001) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1782 · Cited by 1,506
Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity
Croft, H., Chen, J. M., Luo, X., Bartlett, P., Chen, B., & Staebler, R. M. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13599 · Cited by 744
Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species
Kong, D., Ma, C., Zhang, Q., Li, L., Chen, X., Zeng, H., & Guo, D. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12842 · Cited by 577
Cited by
Shedeed, Z. A., Gheda, S., Elsanadily, S., Alharbi, K., & Osman, M. E. H. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12060781 · Cited by 58
Saapilin, N. S., Yong, W. T. L., Cheong, B. E., Kamaruzaman, K. A., & Rodrigues, K. F. (2022) · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture · doi:10.1186/s40538-022-00293-4 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., He, N., Hou, J., Xu, L., Liu, C., Zhang, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, X., & Wu, X.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-06-04
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2296-701X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801395401
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Influencing Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Natural Forests at the Biome Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fevo.2018.00064
- The paper
- Li, Y., He, N., Hou, J., Xu, L., Liu, C., Zhang, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, X., & Wu, X. (2018). Factors Influencing Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Natural Forests at the Biome Scale. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.