Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global forest carbon uptake due to nitrogen and phosphorus deposition from 1850 to 2100

Open access
Wang, Rong, Goll, Daniel, Balkanski, Yves, Hauglustaine, Didier, Boucher, Olivier, Ciais, Philippe, Janssens, Ivan, Penuelas, Josep, Guenet, Bertrand, Sardans, Jordi, Bopp, Laurent, Vuichard, Nicolas, Zhou, Feng, Li, Bengang, Piao, Shilong, Peng, Shushi, Huang, Ye, Tao, Shu·2017·Global Change Biology

Abstract

Spatial patterns and temporal trends of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) deposition are important for quantifying their impact on forest carbon (C) uptake. In a first step, we modeled historical and future change in the global distributions of the atmospheric deposition of N and P from the dry and wet deposition of aerosols and gases containing N and P. Future projections were compared between two scenarios with contrasting aerosol emissions. Modeled fields of N and P deposition and P concentration were evaluated using globally distributed in situ measurements. N deposition peaked around 1990 in European forests and around 2010 in East Asian forests, and both increased sevenfold relative to 1850. P deposition peaked around 2010 in South Asian forests and increased 3.5‐fold relative to 1850. In a second step, we estimated the change in C storage in forests due to the fertilization by deposited N and P (∆C ν dep), based on the retention of deposited nutrients, their allocation within plants, and C:N and C:P stoichiometry. ∆C ν dep for 1997–2013 was estimated to be 0.27 ± 0.13 Pg C year−1 from N and 0.054 ± 0.10 Pg C year−1 from P, contributing 9% and 2% of the terrestrial C sink, respectively. Sensitivity tests show that uncertainty of ∆C ν dep was larger from P than from N, mainly due to uncertainty in the fraction of deposited P that is fixed by soil. ∆C P dep was exceeded by ∆C N dep over 1960–2007 in a large area of East Asian and West European forests due to a faster growth in N deposition than P. Our results suggest a significant contribution of anthropogenic P deposition to C storage, and additional sources of N are needed to support C storage by P in some Asian tropical forests where the deposition rate increased even faster for P than for N.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcb.13766

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Wang, R., Goll, D., Balkanski, Y., Hauglustaine, D., Boucher, O., Ciais, P., Janssens, I., Penuelas, J., Guenet, B., Sardans, J., Bopp, L., Vuichard, N., Zhou, F., Li, B., Piao, S., Peng, S., Huang, Y., & Tao, S.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-26
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
4854-4872
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2614820912
Cited by
224
References
9
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global forest carbon uptake due to nitrogen and phosphorus deposition from 1850 to 2100. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/gcb.13766
The paper
Wang, R., Goll, D., Balkanski, Y., Hauglustaine, D., Boucher, O., Ciais, P., Janssens, I., Penuelas, J., Guenet, B., Sardans, J., Bopp, L., Vuichard, N., Zhou, F., Li, B., Piao, S., Peng, S., Huang, Y., & Tao, S. (2017). Global forest carbon uptake due to nitrogen and phosphorus deposition from 1850 to 2100. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13766

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.