Global trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Although the role of livestock in future food systems is debated, animal proteins are unlikely to completely disappear from our diet. Grasslands are a key source of primary productivity for livestock, and feed‐food competition is often limited on such land. Previous research on the potential for sustainable grazing has focused on restricted geographical areas or does not consider inter‐annual changes in grazing opportunities. Here, we developed a robust method to estimate trends and interannual variability (IV) in global livestock carrying capacity (number of grazing animals a piece of land can support) over 2001–2015, as well as relative stocking density (the reported livestock distribution relative to the estimated carrying capacity [CC]) in 2010. We first estimated the aboveground biomass that is available for grazers on global grasslands based on the MODIS Net Primary Production product. This was then used to calculate livestock carrying capacities using slopes, forest cover, and animal forage requirements as restrictions. We found that globally, CC decreased on 27% of total grasslands area, mostly in Europe and southeastern Brazil, while it increased on 15% of grasslands, particularly in Sudano‐Sahel and some parts of South America. In 2010, livestock forage requirements exceeded forage availability in northwestern Europe, and southern and eastern Asia. Although our findings imply some opportunities to increase grazing pressures in cold regions, Central Africa, and Australia, the high IV or low biomass supply might prevent considerable increases in stocking densities. The approach and derived open access data sets can feed into global food system modelling, support conservation efforts to reduce land degradation associated with overgrazing, and help identify undergrazed areas for targeted sustainable intensification efforts or rewilding purposes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Soil C-sequestration potential in grasslands can only possibly cancel out a continuous flow of enteric CH4 emissions in rather extensive systems, mostly with a cattle density lower than one head per hectare.
“The low values of cattle numbers in Fig. 3 indicate that soil C-sequestration potential in grasslands can only possibly cancel out a continuous flow of enteric CH4 emissions in rather extensive systems (mostly with a cattle density lower than one head per hectare), whereas the density in practice is generally much higher than that32,33.”
From Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
The Results and Interpretation section reports livestock densities relative to grassland carrying capacity and says that many grazing lands are near or above their estimated capacity. It does not establish that cattle density is generally above one head per hectare. The paper also does not assess whether grassland soil carbon sequestration can offset continuing enteric methane emissions; that is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding of this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244693 · Cited by 11,704 · see citing works
Proxy global assessment of land degradation
Bai, Z. G., Dent, D. L., Olsson, L., & Schaepman, M. E. (2008) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00169.x · Cited by 987 · see citing works
Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption
Van Zanten, H. H. E., Herrero, M., Van Hal, O., Röös, E., Muller, A., Garnett, T., Gerber, P. J., Schader, C., & De Boer, I. J. M. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14321 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A., & Hegewisch, K. C. (2018). TerraClimate, a high‐resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Scientific Data, 5(1). 10.1038/sdata.2017.191 PMC5759372 29313841 · DOI
- Alkemade, R., Reid, R. S., van den Berg, M., de Leeuw, J., & Jeuken, M. (2013). Assessing the impacts of livestock production on biodiversity in rangeland ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(52), 20900– 20905. 10.1073/pnas.1011013108 22308313 PMC3876242 · DOI
- Alqaisi, O., Ndambi, O. A., Uddin, M. M., & Hemme, T. (2010). Current situation and the development of the dairy industry in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Syria. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42(6), 1063– 1071. 10.1007/s11250-010-9553-y 20352329 · DOI
- Amatulli, G., McInerney, D., Sethi, T., Strobl, P., & Domisch, S. (2020). Geomorpho90m, empirical evaluation and accuracy assessment of global high‐resolution geomorphometric layers. Scientific Data, 7(1), 162. 10.1038/s41597-020-0479-6 32467582 PMC7256046 · DOI
- Arneth, A., Denton, F., Agus, F., Elbehri, A., Erb, K. H., Elasha, B. O., Rahimi, M., Rounsevell, M., Spence, A., & Valentini, R. (2019). Framing and context. In Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (pp. 1–98). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/2b.‐Chapter‐1_FINAL.pdf
- Barbehenn, R. V., Chen, Z., Karowe, D. N., & Spickard, A. (2004). C3 grasses have higher nutritional quality than C4 grasses under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biology, 10(9), 1565– 1575. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00833.x · DOI
- Bengtsson, J., Bullock, J. M., Egoh, B., Everson, C., Everson, T., O’Connor, T., O’Farrell, P. J., Smith, H. G., & Lindborg, R. (2019). Grasslands—More important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere, 10(2), e02582. 10.1002/ecs2.2582 · DOI
- Bornard, A., & Dubost, M. (1992). Diagnostic agro‐écologique de la végétation des alpages laitiers des Alpes du Nord humides: Établissement et utilisation d’une typologie simplifiée. Agronomie, 12(8), 581– 599. 10.1051/agro:19920802 · DOI
- Carver, S. (2019). Rewilding through land abandonment (pp. 99–122). Rewilding, Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108560962.006 · DOI
- Chang, J., Viovy, N., Vuichard, N., Ciais, P., Campioli, M., Klumpp, K., Martin, R., Leip, A., & Soussana, J.‐F. (2015). Modeled changes in potential grassland productivity and in grass‐fed ruminant livestock density in Europe over 1961–2010. PLoS One, 10(5), e0127554. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127554 26018186 PMC4446363 · DOI
- Cheng, D., Peili, S., Xianzhou, Z., Ning, Z., Xi, C., Shoubao, G., & Wanrui, Z. (2017). The Rangeland Livestock carrying capacity and stocking rate in the Kailash Sacred Landscape in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(6), 551– 558. 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.06.001 · DOI
- Cox, G. W., & Waithaka, J. M. (1989). Estimating aboveground net production and grazing harvest by wildlife on tropical grassland range. Oikos, 54(1), 60– 66. 10.2307/3565897 · DOI
- Craine, J. M., Ocheltree, T. W., Nippert, J. B., Towne, E. G., Skibbe, A. M., Kembel, S. W., & Fargione, J. E. (2013). Global diversity of drought tolerance and grassland climate‐change resilience. Nature Climate Change, 3(1), 63– 67. 10.1038/nclimate1634 · DOI
- De Leeuw, J., Rizayeva, A., Namazov, E., Bayramov, E., Marshall, M. T., Etzold, J., & Neudert, R. (2019). Application of the MODIS MOD 17 Net Primary Production product in grassland carrying capacity assessment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 78, 66– 76. 10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.014 · DOI
- De Leeuw, J., Waweru, M. N., Okello, O. O., Maloba, M., Nguru, P., Said, M. Y., Aligula, H. M., Heitkönig, I. M. A., & Reid, R. S. (2001). Distribution and diversity of wildlife in northern Kenya in relation to livestock and permanent water points. Biological Conservation, 100(3), 297– 306. 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00034-9 · DOI
- Dengler, J., Janišová, M., Török, P., & Wellstein, C. (2014). Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: A synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 182, 1– 14. 10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.015 · DOI
- Dixon, J., Garrity, D. P., Boffa, J.‐M., Williams, T. O., Amede, T., Auricht, C., Lott, R., & Mburathi, G. (Eds.). (2019). Farming systems and food security in Africa: priorities for science and policy under global change (1st ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315658841 · DOI
- Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (Vol. 5). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Hayama.
- Erb, K.‐H., Fetzel, T., Kastner, T., Kroisleitner, C., Lauk, C., Mayer, A., & Niedertscheider, M. (2016). Livestock grazing, the neglected land use. Social Ecology, 295–313. 10.1007/978-3-319-33326-7_13 · DOI
- Estel, S., Mader, S., Levers, C., Verburg, P. H., Baumann, M., & Kuemmerle, T. (2018). Combining satellite data and agricultural statistics to map grassland management intensity in Europe. Environmental Research Letters, 13(7). 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc7a · DOI
- Fetzel, T., Havlik, P., Herrero, M., & Erb, K.‐H. (2017). Seasonality constraints to livestock grazing intensity. Global Change Biology, 23(4), 1636– 1647. 10.1111/gcb.13591 27976453 · DOI
- Fetzel, T., Havlik, P., Herrero, M., Kaplan, J. O., Kastner, T., Kroisleitner, C., Rolinski, S., Searchinger, T., Bodegom, P. M. V., Wirsenius, S., & Erb, K.‐H. (2017). Quantification of uncertainties in global grazing systems assessment. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 31(7), 1089– 1102. 10.1002/2016GB005601 · DOI
- Fidelis, A., di Lyra, M. F., & Pivello, V. R. (2013). Above‐ and below‐ground biomass and carbon dynamics in Brazilian Cerrado wet grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24(2), 356– 364. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01465.x · DOI
- Filazzola, A., Brown, C., Dettlaff, M. A., Batbaatar, A., Grenke, J., Bao, T., Heida, I. P., & Cahill, J. F. (2020). The effects of livestock grazing on biodiversity are multi‐trophic: A meta‐analysis. Ecology Letters, 23(8), 1298– 1309. 10.1111/ele.13527 32369874 · DOI
- Fritz, S., See, L., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Obersteiner, M., Van der Velde, M., Boettcher, H., Havlík, P., & Achard, F. (2011). Highlighting continued uncertainty in global land cover maps for the user community. Environmental Research Letters, 6(4). 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044005 · DOI
- Gaitán, J. J., Bran, D. E., Oliva, G. E., Aguiar, M. R., Buono, G. G., Ferrante, D., Nakamatsu, V., Ciari, G., Salomone, J. M., Massara, V., Martínez, G. G., & Maestre, F. T. (2018). Aridity and overgrazing have convergent effects on ecosystem structure and functioning in Patagonian Rangelands. Land Degradation & Development, 29(2), 210– 218. 10.1002/ldr.2694 · DOI
- Gibson, D. J., & Newman, J. A. (2019). Grasslands and climate change. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108163941 · DOI
- Gilbert, M., Nicolas, G., Cinardi, G., Van Boeckel, T. P., Vanwambeke, S. O., Wint, G. R. W., & Robinson, T. P. (2018). Global distribution data for cattle, buffaloes, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens and ducks in 2010. Scientific Data, 5. 10.1038/sdata.2018.227. 180227. PMC6207061 30375994 · DOI
- Godde, C. M., Boone, R., Ash, A. J., Waha, K., Sloat, L., Thornton, P. K., & Herrero, M. (2020). Global rangeland production systems and livelihoods at threat under climate change and variability. Environmental Research Letters. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7395 · DOI
- Godde, C. M., Garnett, T., Thornton, P. K., Ash, A. J., & Herrero, M. (2018). Grazing systems expansion and intensification: Drivers, dynamics, and trade‐offs. Global Food Security, 16, 93– 105. 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.11.003 · DOI
- Gossner, M. M., Lewinsohn, T. M., Kahl, T., Grassein, F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Birkhofer, K., Renner, S. C., Sikorski, J., Wubet, T., Arndt, H., Baumgartner, V., Blaser, S., Blüthgen, N., Börschig, C., Buscot, F., Diekötter, T., Jorge, L. R., Jung, K., … Allan, E. (2016). Land‐use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities. Nature, 540(7632), 266– 269. 10.1038/nature20575 27919075 · DOI · Paper page
- Herrero, M., Havlik, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M. C., Thornton, P. K., Blummel, M., Weiss, F., Grace, D., & Obersteiner, M. (2013). Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(52), 20888– 20893. 10.1073/pnas.1308149110 24344273 PMC3876224 · DOI · Paper page
- Holechek, J., Pieper, R. D., & Herbel, C. H. (2010). Range management: Principles and practices (6th ed.). Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://aalto.finna.fi/Record/alli.899741
- Hui, D., & Jackson, R. B. (2006). Geographical and interannual variability in biomass partitioning in grassland ecosystems: A synthesis of field data. New Phytologist, 169(1), 85– 93. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01569.x 16390421 · DOI
- Irisarri, J. G. N., Aguiar, S., Oesterheld, M., Derner, J. D., & Golluscio, R. A. (2017). A narrower gap of grazing intensity. Reply to Fetzel et al., 2017. Seasonality constrains to livestock grazing intensity. Global Change Biology, 23(10), 3965– 3966. 10.1111/gcb.13800 28675604 · DOI
- John, R., Chen, J., Giannico, V., Park, H., Xiao, J., Shirkey, G., Ouyang, Z., Shao, C., Lafortezza, R., & Qi, J. (2018). Grassland canopy cover and aboveground biomass in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia: Spatiotemporal estimates and controlling factors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 213, 34– 48. 10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.002 · DOI
- Kemp, D. R., Guodong, H., Xiangyang, H., Michalk, D. L., Fujiang, H., Jianping, W., & Yingjun, Z. (2013). Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(21), 8369– 8374. 10.1073/pnas.1208063110 23671092 PMC3666733 · DOI
- Kemp, D. R., & Michalk, D. L. (2007). Towards sustainable grassland and livestock management. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 145(6), 543– 564. 10.1017/S0021859607007253 · DOI
- Klaus, F., Tscharntke, T., Uhler, J., & Grass, I. (2021). Calcareous grassland fragments as sources of bee pollinators for the surrounding agricultural landscape. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26, e01474. 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01474 · DOI
- Le Brocque, A. F., Goodhew, K. A., & Cockfield, G. (2008). Retaining trees in a grazing landscape: Impacts on ground cover in sheep‐grazing agro‐ecosystems in southern Queensland. Veg Futures 08 Conference Proceedings, 30.
- Lloyd, J., Bird, M. I., Vellen, L., Miranda, A. C., Veenendaal, E. M., Djagbletey, G., Miranda, H. S., Cook, G., & Farquhar, G. D. (2008). Contributions of woody and herbaceous vegetation to tropical savanna ecosystem productivity: A quasi‐global estimate. Tree Physiology, 28(3), 451– 468. 10.1093/treephys/28.3.451 18171668 · DOI
- Loeser, M. R. R., Sisk, T. D., & Crews, T. E. (2007). Impact of grazing intensity during drought in an Arizona Grassland. Conservation Biology, 21(1), 87– 97. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00606.x 17298514 · DOI
- Lv, W., Luo, C., Zhang, L., Niu, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., Wang, Y., He, J., Kardol, P., Wang, Q., Li, B., Liu, P., Dorji, T., Zhou, H., Zhao, X., & Zhao, L. (2020). Net neutral carbon responses to warming and grazing in alpine grassland ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 280. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107792 · DOI
- Lyu, X., Li, X., Gong, J., Li, S., Dou, H., Dang, D., Xuan, X., & Wang, H. (2021). Remote‐sensing inversion method for aboveground biomass of typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. Ecological Indicators, 120. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106883 · DOI
- Mayer, A. C., Estermann, B. L., Stöckli, V., & Kreuzer, M. (2005). Experimental determination of the effects of cattle stocking density and grazing period on forest regeneration on a subalpine wood pasture. Animal Research, 54(3), 153– 171. 10.1051/animres:2005018 · DOI
- Monteiro, L. A., Allee, A. M., Campbell, E. E., Lynd, L. R., Soares, J. R., Jaiswal, D., Castro Oliveira, J., Santos Vianna, M., Morishige, A. E., Figueiredo, G. K. D. A., Lamparelli, R. A. C., Mueller, N. D., Gerber, J., Cortez, L. A. B., & Sheehan, J. J. (2020). Assessment of yield gaps on global grazed‐only permanent pasture using climate binning. Global Change Biology, 26(3), 1820– 1832. 10.1111/gcb.14925 31730282 · DOI
- Navarro, L. M., & Pereira, H. M. (2012). Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems, 15(6), 900– 912. 10.1007/s10021-012-9558-7 · DOI
- Naylor, R., Steinfeld, H., Falcon, W., Galloway, J., Smil, V., Bradford, E., Alder, J., & Mooney, H. (2005). Losing the links between livestock and land. Science, 310(5754), 1621– 1622. 10.1126/science.1117856 16339432 · DOI
- Neudert, R., Etzold, J., Münzner, F., Manthey, M., & Busse, S. (2013). The opportunity costs of conserving pasture resources for mobile pastoralists in the Greater Caucasus. Landscape Research, 38(4), 499– 522. 10.1080/01426397.2012.728204 · DOI
- Petz, K., Alkemade, R., Bakkenes, M., Schulp, C. J. E., van der Velde, M., & Leemans, R. (2014). Mapping and modelling trade‐offs and synergies between grazing intensity and ecosystem services in rangelands using global‐scale datasets and models. Global Environmental Change, 29, 223– 234. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.007 · DOI
- Qian, S., Wang, L. Y., & Gong, X. F. (2012). Climate change and its effects on grassland productivity and carrying capacity of livestock in the main grasslands of China. The Rangeland Journal, 34(4), 341– 347. 10.1071/RJ11095 · DOI
- Qin, P., Sun, B., Li, Z., Gao, Z., Li, Y., Yan, Z., & Gao, T. (2021). Estimation of grassland carrying capacity by applying high spatiotemporal remote sensing techniques in Zhenglan Banner, Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability, 13(6), 3123. 10.3390/su13063123 · DOI
- Rees, W. E. (1996). Revisiting carrying capacity: Area‐based indicators of sustainability. Population and Environment, 17(3), 195– 215. 10.1007/BF02208489 · DOI
- Reyer, C., Asrar, G., Betts, R., Chang, J., Chen, M., Ciais, P., Dury, M., François, L., Henrot, A.‐J., Hickler, T., Ito, A., Jacquemin, I., Nishina, K., Mishurov, M., Morfopoulos, C., Munhoven, G., Ostberg, S., Pan, S., Rafique, R., … Büchner, M. (2019). ISIMIP2a simulation data from biomes sector (V. 1.1). 10.5880/PIK.2019.005 · DOI
- Rolinski, S., Müller, C., Heinke, J., Weindl, I., Biewald, A., Bodirsky, B. L., Bondeau, A., Boons‐Prins, E., Bouwman, A., Leffelaar, P., Roller, J. T., Schaphoff, S., & Thonicke, K. (2018). Modeling vegetation and carbon dynamics of managed grasslands at the global scale with LPJmL 3.6. Geoscientific Model Development, 11(1), 429– 451. Retrieved from https://hal‐amu.archives‐ouvertes.fr/hal‐01788178
- Running, S. W., & Zhao, M. (2019). MOD17A3HGF MODIS/Terra Net Primary Production Gap‐Filled Yearly L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid V006. 2019, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. 35. 10.5067/MODIS/MOD17A3HGF.006 · DOI
- Sandström, V., Chrysafi, A., Lamminen, M., Troell, M., Jalava, M., Piipponen, J., Siebert, S., van Hal, O., Virkki, V., & Kummu, M. (2021). Untapped power of food system by‐products to increase global food supply [Preprint]. In Review. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-990009/v1 37118146 · DOI
- Sexton, J. O., Noojipady, P., Anand, A., Song, X.‐P., McMahon, S., Huang, C., Feng, M., Channan, S., & Townshend, J. R. (2015). A model for the propagation of uncertainty from continuous estimates of tree cover to categorical forest cover and change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 156, 418– 425. 10.1016/j.rse.2014.08.038 · DOI
- Sexton, J. O., Noojipady, P., Song, X.‐P., Feng, M., Song, D.‐X., Kim, D.‐H., Anand, A., Huang, C., Channan, S., Pimm, S. L., & Townshend, J. R. (2016). Conservation policy and the measurement of forests. Nature Climate Change, 6(2), 192– 196. 10.1038/nclimate2816 · DOI
- Sexton, J. O., Song, X.‐P., Feng, M., Noojipady, P., Anand, A., Huang, C., Kim, D.‐H., Collins, K. M., Channan, S., DiMiceli, C., & Townshend, J. R. (2013). Global, 30‐m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat‐based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar‐based estimates of error. International Journal of Digital Earth, 6(5), 427– 448. 10.1080/17538947.2013.786146 · DOI · Paper page
- Slevin, D., Tett, S. F., Exbrayat, J.‐F., Bloom, A. A., & Williams, M. (2017). Global evaluation of gross primary productivity in the JULES land surface model v3. 4.1. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(7), 2651– 2670. 10.5194/gmd-10-2651-2017 · DOI
- Steinfeld, H., Mooney, H. A., Schneider, F., & Neville, L. E. (2013). Livestock in a Changing Landscape, Volume 1: Drivers, Consequences, and Responses. Island Press.
- Sulla‐Menashe, D., & Friedl, M. A. (2018). User guide to collection 6 MODIS land cover (MCD12Q1 and MCD12C1) product (pp. 1–18). USGS. 10.5067/MODIS/MCD12Q1.006 · DOI
- Sun, Y., Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, X., Yang, Y., Tang, Z., Wang, S., Su, H., Zhu, J., Chang, J., & Fang, J. (2021). Field‐based estimation of net primary productivity and its above‐ and belowground partitioning in global grasslands. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, 126(11), e2021JG006472. 10.1029/2021JG006472 · DOI
- Suttie, J. M., Reynolds, S. G., & Batello, C. (2005). Grasslands of the World (Vol. 34). Food & Agriculture Org.
- Tamburino, L., Bravo, G., Clough, Y., & Nicholas, K. A. (2020). From population to production: 50 years of scientific literature on how to feed the world. Global Food Security, 24, 100346. 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100346 · DOI
- Vallentine, J. F. (2000). Grazing management (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
- Vetter, S. (2005). Rangelands at equilibrium and non‐equilibrium: Recent developments in the debate. Journal of Arid Environments, 62(2), 321– 341. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.11.015 · DOI
- Wang, C., & Tang, Y. (2019). A global meta‐analyses of the response of multi‐taxa diversity to grazing intensity in grasslands. Environmental Research Letters, 14(11), 114003. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4932 · DOI
- Wolf, J., Chen, M., & Asrar, G. R. (2021). Global Rangeland Primary Production and Its Consumption by Livestock in 2000–2010. Remote Sensing, 13(17), 3430. 10.3390/rs13173430 · DOI
- Xie, S., Liu, L., Zhang, X., Yang, J., Chen, X., & Gao, Y. (2019). Automatic land‐cover mapping using landsat time‐series data based on google earth engine. Remote Sensing, 11(24), 3023. 10.3390/rs11243023 · DOI
- Yang, S., Feng, Q., Liang, T., Liu, B., Zhang, W., & Xie, H. (2018). Modeling grassland above‐ground biomass based on artificial neural network and remote sensing in the Three‐River Headwaters Region. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204, 448– 455. 10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.011 · DOI
- Yang, Y. H., Fang, J. Y., Pan, Y. D., & Ji, C. J. (2009). Aboveground biomass in Tibetan grasslands. Journal of Arid Environments, 73(1), 91– 95. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.09.027 · DOI
- Yi, S., Wu, N., Luo, P., Wang, Q., Shi, F., Zhang, Q., & Ma, J. (2008). Agricultural heritage in disintegration: Trends of agropastoral transhumance on the southeast Tibetan Plateau. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(3), 273– 283. 10.3843/SusDev.15.3:10 · DOI
- Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Liu, W., Qi, Y., & Wo, X. (2014). Livestock‐carrying capacity and overgrazing status of alpine grassland in the Three‐River Headwaters region, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(2), 303– 312. 10.1007/s11442-014-1089-z · DOI
- Zhao, F., Xu, B., Yang, X., Jin, Y., Li, J., Xia, L., Chen, S., & Ma, H. (2014). Remote sensing estimates of grassland aboveground biomass based on MODIS net primary productivity (NPP): A case study in the Xilingol grassland of Northern China. Remote Sensing, 6(6), 5368– 5386. 10.3390/rs6065368 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions
Wang, Y., de Boer, I. J. M., Persson, U. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Cederberg, C., Gerber, P. J., Smith, P., & van Middelaar, C. E. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43452-3 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Piipponen, J., Jalava, M., de Leeuw, J., Rizayeva, A., Godde, C., Cramer, G., Herrero, M., & Kummu, M.
- Affiliations
- Aalto University (FI)
- Department of Bioecology Baku State University Baku Azerbaijan
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Agriculture and Food St Lucia QLD Australia
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Piipponen, Johannes
- Kummu, Matti
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3902-3919
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- PMC
- PMC9321565
- OpenAlex
- W4221053777
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 21.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland (317320, 339834)
- Maa- ja Vesitekniikan Tuki Ry
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV023682)
- H2020 European Research Council (819202)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Keywords
- grassland carrying capacity, livestock density, grazing intensity, net primary productivity, aboveground biomass, forage availability, interannual variability, sustainable grazing, overgrazing, land degradation, rewilding, sustainable intensification, animal protein intake
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brazil, Conservation of Natural Resources, Biomass, Livestock, Grassland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review