Cited by 111Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsBioenergy crop production and managementSoil erosion and sediment transport

Changes in soil carbon stocks under perennial and annual bioenergy crops

Open access
Ferchaud, Fabien, Vitte, Guillaume, Mary, Bruno·2016·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Bioenergy crops are expected to provide biomass to replace fossil resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In this context, changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks are of primary importance. The aim of this study was to measure changes in SOC stocks in bioenergy cropping systems comparing perennial ( Miscanthus × giganteus and switchgrass), semi‐perennial (fescue and alfalfa), and annual (sorghum and triticale) crops, all established after arable crops. The soil was sampled at the start of the experiment and 5 or 6 years later. SOC stocks were calculated at equivalent soil mass, and δ 13 C measurements were used to calculate changes in new and old SOC stocks. Crop residues found in soil at the time of SOC measurements represented 3.5–7.2 t C ha −1 under perennial crops vs. 0.1–0.6 t C ha −1 for the other crops. During the 5‐year period, SOC concentrations under perennial crops increased in the surface layer (0–5 cm) and slightly declined in the lower layers. Changes in δ 13 C showed that C inputs were mainly located in the 0–18 cm layer. In contrast, SOC concentrations increased over time under semi‐perennial crops throughout the old ploughed layer (ca. 0–33 cm). SOC stocks in the old ploughed layer increased significantly over time under semi‐perennials with a mean increase of 0.93 ± 0.28 t C ha −1 yr −1 , whereas no change occurred under perennial or annual crops. New SOC accumulation was higher for semi‐perennial than for perennial crops (1.50 vs. 0.58 t C ha −1 yr −1 , respectively), indicating that the SOC change was due to a variation in C input rather than a change in mineralization rate. Nitrogen fertilization rate had no significant effect on SOC stocks. This study highlights the interest of comparing SOC changes over time for various cropping systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12249

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perennials produce more plant residues than annual crops.

    “Soils that transition from annual to perennial crops may likely benefit from both: perennials produce more plant residues than annual crops (Ferchaud et al., 2016) and this extra organic matter consequently returns to the soil.”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ferchaud et al., 2016

  • Perennials have potential additional plant inputs from management interventions such as pruning and on-site retention of litter.

    “Perennials not only produce more plant residue than annual crops (Ferchaud et al., 2016) but also have the potential additional plant inputs from management interventions such us pruning and on-site retention of litter (Ledo et al., 2018).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under perennial crops (2020) · cites this paper as Ferchaud et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferchaud, F., Vitte, G., & Mary, B.
Affiliations
Fractionnation of AgroResources and Environment (FR)
Corresponding author
Ferchaud, Fabien
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-26
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
290-306
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2158523516
Cited by
111
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • French National Agency (ANR)
  • BPI-France
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon stocks, energy crops, perennial crops, annual crops, Miscanthus × giganteus, switchgrass, Festuca, alfalfa, sorghum, triticale, carbon isotopes, crop residues, nitrogen fertilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review