Cited by 23Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Do projections from bioclimatic envelope models and climate change metrics match

Garcia, Raquel A., Cabeza, Mar, Altwegg, Res, Araújo, Miguel B.·2016·Global Ecology and Biogeography

Abstract

Abstract Aim Bioclimatic envelope models are widely used to describe changes in climatically suitable areas for species under future climate scenarios. Climate change metrics are applied independently of species data to characterize the spatio‐temporal dynamics of climate, and have also been used as indicators of the exposure of species to climate change. Here, we investigate whether these two approaches provide qualitatively similar indications about where biodiversity is potentially most exposed to climate change. Location Sub‐Saharan Africa. Methods We compared a range of climate change metrics for sub‐Saharan Africa with ensembles of bioclimatic envelope models for 2723 species of amphibians, snakes, mammals and birds. For each taxonomic group, we performed three comparisons between the two approaches: (1) is projected change in local climatic suitability (models) greater in grid cells with larger temporal differences in local climate (metrics); (2) are projected losses or gains of climatically suitable areas (models) greater for species in grid cells with climates that are projected to be less or more available in the future, respectively (metrics); and (3) are projected shifts in the position of climatically suitable areas (models) greater for species in grid cells with climates projected to move farther in space (metrics)? Results The changes in climatic suitability projected by the bioclimatic envelope models covaried with the climatic changes measured with the metrics. Agreement between the two approaches was found for all taxonomic groups, although it was stronger for species with a narrower climatic envelope breadth. Main conclusions For sub‐Saharan African vertebrates, projected patterns of exposure to climate change given by climate change metrics alone were qualitatively comparable to bioclimatic model projections of changes in areas of suitable climate for species. Assessments based on climate change metrics can thus be useful for making first‐cut inferences about the potential effects of climate change on regions with poorly known biodiversity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/geb.12386

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite limitations, the overall tendencies of the present study's projections reflect major climatic drivers of change, and thus are bound to be ecologically meaningful.

    “Despite these limitations, the overall tendencies of the present study ' s projections re fl ect major climatic drivers of change, and thus are bound to be ecologically meaningful (Garcia et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia, R. A., Cabeza, M., Altwegg, R., & Araújo, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Garcia, Raquel A.
Venue
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-07
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
65-74
ISSN
  • 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-8238
OpenAlex
W1923706058
Cited by
23
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
bioclimatic envelope models, climate suitability, range shifts, amphibians, snakes, mammals, birds, vertebrates, sub-Saharan Africa, biodiversity conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review