Cited by 36Cephalopods and Marine BiologySpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeMarine Biology and Ecology Research

Global patterns of coastal cephalopod diversity under climate change

Open access
Boavida-Portugal, Joana, Guilhaumon, François, Rosa, Rui, Araújo, Miguel B.·2022·Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract

Coastal marine ecosystems are currently being exposed to climate change at a much faster rate than many other ecosystems, with coastal species being exposed to multiple stressors. Cephalopod mollusks play a pivotal role in marine trophic webs, and most are “keystone” species due to their influence on ecosystem dynamics. In this study, we characterized the global patterns of coastal cephalopod diversity and present, for the first time, a global forecast of potential changes in richness, mean body size, and assemblage composition (i.e., species replacement, nestedness, and combinations of both) for 161 coastal cephalopod species under climate change, using an ensemble of ecological niche models (ENMs) for an end of the century mitigation scenario. We have shown that, for the baseline period, coastal cephalopod diversity is higher in the Central Indo-Pacific area and that body size patterns follow the temperature-size rule, with larger animals occurring at higher latitudes. The end-century projections of habitat suitability show a different picture, with 96% of cephalopod species predicted to experience range contraction and 15% completely losing their environmental space. Nestedness is projected to be the main effect of species compositional change. Maximum body size is projected to increase in 44% of the pixels and decrease in 37%. Regarding fisheries, the projected changes are more favorable to the countries at higher latitudes, although the search for refugia of smaller tropical species might potentially lead to a mitigation of the negative effects of climate change in these areas, as measured by the total capture (ton). While the model has limitations, our findings reflect major climatic drivers of change and highlight the idea that even though cephalopod species seem good candidates to replace overexploited fish stocks in the near future, they may not have the environmental space to do so.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmars.2021.740781

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research employing SDM to project potential biogeographical impacts of marine climate change on octopuses remains very scarce, with few studies focusing on species of the OVSC and at this scale.

    “However, research employing this modelling approach to project potential biogeographical impacts of marine climate change on octopuses remains very scarce (Hermosilla et al., 2011; Lima et al., 2020; A ́ ngeles-Gonza ́ lez et al., 2021; Schickele et al., 2021; Boavida-Portugal et al., 2022), with few studies focusing on species of the OVSC and at this scale.”

    From Projecting future climate change impacts on the distribution of the ‘Octopus vulgaris species complex’ (2022) · cites this paper as Boavida-Portugal et al., 2022

    The Methods section describes modelling 11 octopus species, and the Discussion calls this a first attempt to project global coastal cephalopod diversity under climate change, supporting the paper as an example of the limited work at this scale. The copy does not identify species of the OVSC or establish how few studies focus on them. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. x · DOI · Paper page
  2. aai9214 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Boavida-Portugal, J., Guilhaumon, F., Rosa, R., & Araújo, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Évora (PT)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Boavida-Portugal, Joana
Venue
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2022-01-28
Volume
8
ISSN
2296-7745 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210650654
Cited by
36
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Marine Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/51514/2011, PTDC/MAR/0908066/2008, 1/SAESCTN/ALENT-07-0224-FEDER-001755, PTDC/BIA-BEC/103266/2008)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
climate change impacts, body size, temperature-size rule, nestedness, species replacement, ecological niche modeling, habitat suitability, range contraction, refugia, Central Indo-Pacific, keystone species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review