Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 677

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical climate justice

Sultana, Farhana·2022·The Geographical Journal

Abstract

Climate change has had unequal and uneven burdens across places whereby the planetary crisis involves a common but differentiated responsibility. The injustices of intensifying climate breakdown have laid bare the fault lines of suffering across sites and scales. A climate justice framework helps us to think about and address these inequities. Climate justice fundamentally is about paying attention to how climate change impacts people differently, unevenly, and disproportionately, as well as redressing the resultant injustices in fair and equitable ways. Critical climate justice as a praxis of solidarity and collective action benefits from greater engagement with intersectional and international feminist scholarship. Incorporating insights from feminist climate justice bolsters solidarity praxis while enriching and reframing dominant climate change discussions for more impactful and accountable action.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/geoj.12417

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bond P., 2016, Who wins from “climate apartheid”? African climate justice narratives about the Paris COP21, New Politics, 15, 83
  2. Brand U., 2009, Contours of climate justice: Ideas for shaping new climate and energy politics, Critical Currents, 6, 46
  3. Burkett M., 2009, Climate reparations, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 10, 509
  4. 10.5040/9781350219236.ch-009 · doi:10.5040/9781350219236.ch-009
  5. 10.18352/ijc.972 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/hypa.12099 · doi:10.1111/hypa.12099
  7. 10.1080/13552074.2020.1843830 · doi:10.1080/13552074.2020.1843830
  8. 10.4324/9781315671468-9 · doi:10.4324/9781315671468-9
  9. Freire P., 1970, Pedagogy of the oppressed
  10. 10.1080/13552074.2020.1838168 · doi:10.1080/13552074.2020.1838168
  11. Gardiner S.M., 2011, Climate justice
  12. IPCC, 2021, Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
  13. Moore J., 2017, Unearthing the capitalocene: Towards a reparations ecology, Roar Magazine, 18
  14. Táíwò O., 2019, How a green new deal could exploit developing countries, The Conversation
  15. Verges F., 2017, Futures of black radicalism

Cited by

See all 677

Metadata

Authors
Sultana, F.
Venue
The Geographical Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-02
Volume
188
Issue
1
Pages
118-124
ISSN
  • 0016-7398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4959
OpenAlex
W3206193091
Cited by
677
References
45
FWCI
105.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical climate justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geoj.12417
The paper
Sultana, F. (2022). Critical climate justice. The Geographical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12417

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.